§Why CasetextPricing

Hon. Susan Larabee, et al., Appellants,v.The Governor of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,610 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  2. Martinez v. City of Schenectady

    97 N.Y.2d 78 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 699 times
    Holding no favorable termination when the plaintiffs "felony conviction was reversed not because of her lack of culpability - indeed, her guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt - but because the evidence that formed the basis for her conviction was obtained pursuant to a faulty search warrant"

  3. Brown v. State of New York

    89 N.Y.2d 172 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 568 times
    Holding that award of damages for constitutional tort was necessary where injunctive remedies “all fall short”

  4. Klostermann v. Cuomo

    61 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 411 times
    In Klostermann, the public agencies involved were in repeated noncompliance with the command of Mental Hygiene Law § 29.15 (g), which required preparation of a written service plan, with prescribed contents, for every person discharged from state psychiatric hospitals.

  5. In re Maron

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8573 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 69 times
    Finding link between legislative and judicial pay increases unconstitutional under New York state constitution

  6. Flores v. City of Mount Vernon

    41 F. Supp. 2d 439 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that plaintiff's New York State Constitutional claims should be dismissed "because no private right of action exists for violation of the New York State Constitution where a Plaintiff has alternative damage remedies" under Section 1983

  7. Weissman v. Evans

    56 N.Y.2d 458 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 65 times
    In Weissman v Evans (56 N.Y.2d 458, supra), we held that there was no rational basis for a wage disparity between District Court Judges in contiguous Nassau and Suffolk Counties.

  8. Larabee v. Governor

    65 A.D.3d 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 18 times
    In Larabee, the order of Appellate Division should be modified, and in Chief Judge, the judgment of Supreme Court and the order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by granting judgment declaring that under the circumstances of these cases, as a matter of law, the State defendants' failure to consider judicial compensation on the merits violates the Separation of Powers Doctrine, and by allowing for the remedy discussed in this opinion, and, as modified, affirmed.

  9. Beer v. United States

    696 F.3d 1174 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that a 2001 amendment to an appropriations bill did not impliedly repeal a 1989 law that guaranteed judicial cost of living adjustments

  10. Larabee v. Governor of State

    121 A.D.3d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    2014-07-10 Hon. Susan LARABEE, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. The GOVERNOR OF the STATE of New York, et al., Defendants–Respondents. The Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, The Supreme Court Justices Association of the City of New York, Inc. and The New York State Association of City Court Judges, Amici Curiae. Plaintiffs appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered September 14, 2012, which, upon renewal of their

  11. Section 4 - Vermont boundary line

    N.Y. State Law § 4   Cited 15 times

    The boundary line between the state of New York and the state of Vermont shall be and hereby is fixed as follows: Beginning at a stone bound standing on the easterly slope of a hill, in latitude forty-two degrees forty-four minutes forty-five and two hundred one thousandths seconds north, longitude seventy-three degrees fifteen minutes fifty-four and nine hundred four thousandths seconds west from Greenwich, a point in the southerly line of the state of Vermont; thence the line runs on a bearing

  12. Section 6 - Pennsylvania boundary line

    N.Y. State Law § 6   Cited 3 times

    The boundary line between the states of New York and Pennsylvania is as follows: Commencing at said intersection of said meridian line of cession, and running thence south to the shore of Lake Erie at initial monument set by A. Ellicott in 1790 as above; thence true south 440 feet to a large monument of Quincy granite, set in 1869, in latitude 42º 16' 5.39", and longitude 79º 45' 45.26", as deduced by the United States lake survey, marked 1869, latitude 42º 15' 57.9", longitude 79º 45' 54.4", by