§Why CasetextPricing

Hon. Susan Larabee, et al., Appellants,v.The Governor of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Brief

29 Cited authorities

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

    514 U.S. 211 (1995)   Cited 883 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding legislated invalidation of final judgments to be categorically unconstitutional

  2. McLean v. City of New York

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2449 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 553 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing shortcomings in conduct of municipal employees that could have prevented harm incurred by plaintiffs, but noting that "this is not the test" for municipal liability

  3. Martinez v. City of Schenectady

    97 N.Y.2d 78 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 697 times
    Holding no favorable termination when the plaintiffs "felony conviction was reversed not because of her lack of culpability - indeed, her guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt - but because the evidence that formed the basis for her conviction was obtained pursuant to a faulty search warrant"

  4. Valdez v. City of New York

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7252 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 464 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the "fundamental obligation of a plaintiff pursuing a negligence cause of action to prove that the putative defendant owed a duty of care"

  5. Brown v. State of New York

    89 N.Y.2d 172 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 566 times
    Holding that award of damages for constitutional tort was necessary where injunctive remedies “all fall short”

  6. Burns Jackson v. Lindner

    59 N.Y.2d 314 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 815 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff had common law right to sue for illegal strikes despite lack of a private cause of action under New York statute prohibiting illegal strikes

  7. Arteaga v. State of New York

    72 N.Y.2d 212 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 627 times
    Finding absolute immunity appropriate when a defendant's conduct "involves the conscious exercise of discretion of a judicial or quasi-judicial nature"

  8. Saarinen v. Kerr

    84 N.Y.2d 494 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 404 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a standard of "reckless disregard for the safety of others" required evidence that defendant had engaged in conduct "of an unreasonable character in disregard of a known or obvious risk that was so great as to make it highly probable that harm would follow and ha[d] done so with conscious indifference to the outcome"

  9. CPC International Inc. v. McKesson

    70 N.Y.2d 268 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 316 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that financial projections were "material existing fact, sufficient to support a fraud action"

  10. Lichtenstein v. State

    93 N.Y.2d 911 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 203 times
    Dismissing claim for failure to comply with Court of Claims Act § 10 and