2013-07-3 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Garfield J. SORRELL, Jr., Appellant. Robert D. Siglin, Elmira, for appellant. Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Nicholas J. Evanovich of counsel), for respondent. SPAIN Robert D. Siglin, Elmira, for appellant. Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Nicholas J. Evanovich of counsel), for respondent. Before: ROSE, J.P., STEIN, SPAIN and GARRY, JJ. SPAIN, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J
November 13, 2007. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau Court (LaPera, J.), rendered August 8, 2006, convicting her of hindering prosecution in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Before: Crane, J.P., Lifson, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the
January 27, 1998 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.). The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant's participation in the sale was established by evidence that included defendant's actions as a lookout during the sale. Defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would require a further record to be developed by way of an appropriate motion pursuant to