5 Cited authorities

  1. Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7256 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 41 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2011-10-18 Gloria DOOMES, Appellant, v. BEST TRANSIT CORP. et al., Defendants,andWarrick Industries, Inc., Doing Business as Goshen Coach, Respondent.Ana Jiminian, Appellant, v. Best Transit Corp. et al., Defendants,andWarrick Industries, Inc., Doing Business as Goshen Coach, Respondent.Kelli Rivera, Appellant, v. Best Transit Corp. et al., Defendants,andWarrick Industries, Inc., Doing Business as Goshen Coach, Respondent. Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel)

  2. Barrow v. Dubois

    82 A.D.3d 1685 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 6 times

    No. CA 10-01140. March 25, 2011. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered December 11, 2009 in a personal injury action. The judgment awarded plaintiffs money damages upon a jury verdict. HORIGAN, HORIGAN LOMBARDO, P.C., AMSTERDAM (JAMES A. LOMBARDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. CALLI, CALLI CULLY, UTICA (HERBERT J. CULLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. Present: Centra, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered

  3. Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.

    92 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 3 times

    2012-02-14 Gloria DOOMES, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. BEST TRANSIT CORP., et al., Defendants,Warrick Industries, Inc., etc., Defendant–Appellant.Ana Jiminian, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Best Transit Corp., et al., Defendants,Warrick Industries, Inc., etc., Defendant–Appellant.Kelli Rivera, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Best Transit Corp., et al., Defendants,Warrick Industries, Inc., etc., Defendant–Appellant. Shaub Ahmuty Citrin & Spratt LLP, Lake Success (Steven J. Ahmuty, Jr., Timothy R. Capowski

  4. Delay v. Rhinehart

    176 A.D.2d 1211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 11 times

    October 4, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: A jury verdict in favor of defendant should not be set aside unless the evidence in favor of plaintiff is so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Kuncio v Fillmore Hosp., 117 A.D.2d 975, 976, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 608; Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129,

  5. Pinto v. Pyramid Tire, Inc.

    193 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 6 times

    May 17, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lodato, J.). Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, the order dated December 14, 1988, is vacated, the motion to set aside the verdict against it is granted, and the appellant is granted a new trial on the issue of liability, with costs to abide the event. This action arises from a one-car accident that allegedly occurred on or about August 31, 1979. The plaintiff claims that the accident