34 Cited authorities

  1. Moses H. Cone Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.

    460 U.S. 1 (1983)   Cited 11,894 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding stay order appealable under § 1291 where it put the litigant "effectively out of court," and "surrender[ed] jurisdiction of a federal suit to a state court"
  2. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,366 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement
  3. Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth

    473 U.S. 614 (1985)   Cited 4,232 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act emphatically favors arbitration
  4. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,201 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"
  5. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams

    532 U.S. 105 (2001)   Cited 1,535 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "any other class of workers engaged in ... commerce," following the specific examples of seamen and railroad employees, includes only "transportation workers," because construing it to include all other workers "fails to give independent effect to the statute’s enumeration of the specific categories of workers" that precede it
  6. Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Casarotto

    517 U.S. 681 (1996)   Cited 1,859 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding "that Montana's first-page notice requirement, which governs not ‘any contract,’ but specifically and solely contracts ‘subject to arbitration,’ conflicts with the FAA and is therefore displaced by the federal measure."
  7. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson

    513 U.S. 265 (1995)   Cited 1,601 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that term "involving commerce" reflects "an intent to exercise Congress' commerce power to the full"
  8. Shearson/Am. Express Inc. v. McMahon

    482 U.S. 220 (1987)   Cited 1,797 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to a claim under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  9. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

    514 U.S. 52 (1995)   Cited 1,239 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should be guided by the “cardinal principle of contract construction: that a document should be read to give effect to all of its provisions and to render them consistent with each other”
  10. Southland Corp. v. Keating

    465 U.S. 1 (1984)   Cited 1,869 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that through the FAA, "Congress intended to foreclose state legislative attempts to undercut the enforceability of arbitration agreements"
  11. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 10,867 times   117 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"
  12. Section 3 - Stay of proceedings where issue therein referable to arbitration

    9 U.S.C. § 3   Cited 7,052 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Providing for a stay of judicial proceedings on "issue referable to arbitration"
  13. Section 31000 - Short title

    Cal. Corp. Code § 31000   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This division may be known as the "Franchise Investment Law." References in this division to "this law" refer to the applicable provisions of this division. Ca. Corp. Code § 31000 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1400.

  14. Section 31512 - Waiver of compliance void

    Cal. Corp. Code § 31512   Cited 45 times
    Providing that, "any condition, stipulation or provision purporting to bind any person acquiring a franchise to waive any compliance with any provision of this law or any rule or order hereunder is void."