54 Cited authorities

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (1993) Cited 7,927 times
Holding sentence four remand is "judgment" triggering limitations period for attorney's fee motion under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Pierce v. Underwood
487 U.S. 552 (1988) Cited 9,095 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment
Buckhannon Board Care Home v. West Va. D.H.H.R
532 U.S. 598 (2001) Cited 3,797 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the ordinary meaning of "prevailing party" in 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c) and 42 U.S.C. § 12205 allows attorneys’ fees only when there is a "material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties."
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (1991) Cited 5,693 times
Holding that a district court may not use inherent power to remand in a disability benefits case
Commissioner, INS v. Jean
496 U.S. 154 (1990) Cited 2,552 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that this inquiry applies to attorney's fees under the EAJA
Pickering v. Board of Education
391 U.S. 563 (1968) Cited 5,662 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding teacher's dismissal for criticizing school board unconstitutional
Perry v. Sindermann
408 U.S. 593 (1972) Cited 4,498 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that mutually explicit understanding could give rise to protected property interest
Texas Teachers Assn. v. Garland School Dist
489 U.S. 782 (1989) Cited 1,866 times
Holding that where party seeks attorney's fees pursuant to fee-shifting statute, "no fee award is permissible until the [party] has crossed the statutory threshold of prevailing party status" (internal quotation marked omitted)
Florida Power Light Co. v. Lorion
470 U.S. 729 (1985) Cited 1,878 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Hobbs Act vests in the court of appeals initial judicial review authority over an NRC order denying a petition under 10 C.F.R. § 2.206 for suspension of an operating license
Scarborough v. Principi
541 U.S. 401 (2004) Cited 846 times
Holding that a pleading requirement in the Equal Access to Justice Act was not jurisdictional and was therefore curable through subsequent amendment
Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 Cited 108,040 times 195 Legal Analyses
Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"
Section 2412 - Costs and fees
28 U.S.C. § 2412 Cited 28,665 times 22 Legal Analyses
Providing that an EAJA fee motion shall be filed "within thirty days of final judgment"
Section 2155 - Information and advice from private and public sectors
19 U.S.C. § 2155 Cited 12 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring advisory committees to represent "all industry, labor, agricultural, or service interests (including small business interests) in the sector or functional areas concerned"

AUTOR et al v. BLANK et al

54 Cited authorities

Holding sentence four remand is "judgment" triggering limitations period for attorney's fee motion under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Holding that the ordinary meaning of "prevailing party" in 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c) and 42 U.S.C. § 12205 allows attorneys’ fees only when there is a "material alteration of the legal relationship of the parties."

Holding that a district court may not use inherent power to remand in a disability benefits case

Holding that this inquiry applies to attorney's fees under the EAJA

Holding teacher's dismissal for criticizing school board unconstitutional

Holding that mutually explicit understanding could give rise to protected property interest

Holding that where party seeks attorney's fees pursuant to fee-shifting statute, "no fee award is permissible until the [party] has crossed the statutory threshold of prevailing party status" (internal quotation marked omitted)

Holding that the Hobbs Act vests in the court of appeals initial judicial review authority over an NRC order denying a petition under 10 C.F.R. § 2.206 for suspension of an operating license

Holding that a pleading requirement in the Equal Access to Justice Act was not jurisdictional and was therefore curable through subsequent amendment

Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"

Providing that an EAJA fee motion shall be filed "within thirty days of final judgment"

Requiring advisory committees to represent "all industry, labor, agricultural, or service interests (including small business interests) in the sector or functional areas concerned"