28 Cited authorities

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.
528 U.S. 167 (2000) Cited 7,152 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill
484 U.S. 343 (1988) Cited 11,114 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding district courts have discretion whether to dismiss state law claims after all the federal claims are dismissed and explaining the factors courts should consider when doing so
Powell v. McCormack
395 U.S. 486 (1969) Cited 3,054 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained
PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
532 U.S. 661 (2001) Cited 661 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that professional golfer was a client or customer of a golf tour because he paid a one-time qualifying fee
Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.
114 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 2,100 times
Holding that a district court has discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over nonfederal claims if it has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction
U.S. v. Phosphate Export Assn
393 U.S. 199 (1968) Cited 838 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that “the heavy burden of persuasion” that the challenged conduct cannot reasonably be expected to start up again lies with the party asserting mootness
Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
654 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 555 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court did not err "in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over [plaintiff's] state law claims" when it "properly disposed of 'all claims over which it had original jurisdiction.'"
Tandy v. City of Wichita
380 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2004) Cited 311 times
Holding that several plaintiffs who rode the Wichita bus system once could have standing
Angelucci v. Century Supper Club
41 Cal.4th 160 (Cal. 2007) Cited 191 times
Holding that the Unruh Act "must be construed liberally in order to carry out its purpose"
Amir v. St. Louis University
184 F.3d 1017 (8th Cir. 1999) Cited 220 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "St. Louis University maintains both an undergraduate division as well as graduate programs in such areas as law, business, and medicine. Hence, it is a place of public accommodation under the ADA."
Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367 Cited 61,771 times 78 Legal Analyses
Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
Section 12182 - Prohibition of discrimination by public accommodations
42 U.S.C. § 12182 Cited 3,882 times 61 Legal Analyses
Explaining that public accommodations cannot "directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize standards or criteria or methods of administration" that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability."

Aureliano Galvez v. Automobile Club of Southern California et al

28 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Holding district courts have discretion whether to dismiss state law claims after all the federal claims are dismissed and explaining the factors courts should consider when doing so

Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained

Holding that professional golfer was a client or customer of a golf tour because he paid a one-time qualifying fee

Holding that a district court has discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over nonfederal claims if it has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction

Holding that “the heavy burden of persuasion” that the challenged conduct cannot reasonably be expected to start up again lies with the party asserting mootness

Holding that the district court did not err "in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over [plaintiff's] state law claims" when it "properly disposed of 'all claims over which it had original jurisdiction.'"

Holding that several plaintiffs who rode the Wichita bus system once could have standing

Holding that the Unruh Act "must be construed liberally in order to carry out its purpose"

Holding that "St. Louis University maintains both an undergraduate division as well as graduate programs in such areas as law, business, and medicine. Hence, it is a place of public accommodation under the ADA."

Explaining that public accommodations cannot "directly or through contractual or other arrangements, utilize standards or criteria or methods of administration" that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability."