§Why CasetextPricing

AsymmetRx, Inc. v. Biocare Medical LLC et al

MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION To Stay and Compel Arbitration

6 Cited authorities

  1. Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth

    473 U.S. 614 (1985)   Cited 4,324 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court must consider "whether legal constraints external to the parties' agreement foreclosed the arbitration of those claims" prior to enforcing an arbitration clause

  2. Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel

    597 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2010)   Cited 271 times
    Holding that a motion to compel arbitration is not dispositive because a district court retains authority to dissolve stay or review arbitration award

  3. Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd.

    456 F. Supp. 2d 267 (D. Mass. 2006)   Cited 13 times
    Refusing to rule, at motion to dismiss stage, as to whether importation of a drug that appeared to infringe on a patent was for uses within a statutory "safe harbor" or actually infringing, since that was a factual issue

  4. Laughton v. CGI Technologies & Solutions, Inc.

    602 F. Supp. 2d 262 (D. Mass. 2009)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting argument that reference to "remedies" in an agreement containing a mandatory arbitration clause preserves a party's right to litigate and, thus, renders the arbitration provision elective

  5. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,268 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

  6. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 11,329 times   121 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"