28 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Scheuer v. Rhodes

    416 U.S. 232 (1974)   Cited 22,583 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that executive branch officers had qualified immunity
  4. Taylor v. Books a Million, Inc.

    296 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,879 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs in Title VII cases "must exhaust administrative remedies before pursuing claims in federal court"
  5. Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co.

    578 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,189 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint fails to state a claim unless the well-pled factual allegations of the complaint nudge the claims across the line from conceivable to plausible
  6. Financial Sec. v. Stephens, Inc.

    500 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2007)   Cited 634 times
    Holding that it is appropriate to consider a document attached to a motion to dismiss when "a plaintiff refers to a document in its complaint, the document is central to its claim, its contents are not in dispute, and the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss"
  7. O2 Micro Intern. v. Monolithic Power Sys

    467 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 623 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that diligence must be considered in determining whether good cause exists to amend infringement contentions
  8. DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co.

    471 F.3d 1293 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 523 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the record supported jury verdict of no induced infringement where it showed defendant contacted an Australian attorney and "obtained letters from U.S. patent counsel advising that [its product] did not infringe"
  9. McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.

    501 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2007)   Cited 412 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a direct infringement claim made in accordance with Form 16 (now Form 18) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure meets the Twombly pleading standard
  10. U.S. v. Baxter Intern., Inc.

    345 F.3d 866 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 395 times
    Holding that, under MSP, " any payment that Medicare does make is secondary and is subject to reimbursement from sources of primary coverage under the statute," regardless of whether those sources can be expected to pay promptly
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,835 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 162,084 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 39,880 times   331 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  14. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 37,026 times   148 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  15. Section 112 - Specification

    35 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 7,348 times   1044 Legal Analyses
    Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it
  16. Section 284 - Damages

    35 U.S.C. § 284   Cited 2,116 times   198 Legal Analyses
    Granting "interest and costs as fixed by the court"
  17. Rule 84 - Abrogated (Apr. 29, 2015, eff. Dec. 1, 2015).

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 84   Cited 1,037 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that the appended forms "are sufficient under the rules and are intended to indicate the simplicity and brevity of statement which the rules contemplate"
  18. Section 287 - Limitation on damages and other remedies; marking and notice

    35 U.S.C. § 287   Cited 778 times   94 Legal Analyses
    Limiting liability of medical practitioners for performance of certain medical and surgical procedures