§Why CasetextPricing

Ashford et al v. East Coast Express Eviction et al

MOTION for Order Confirming Service on Defendant East Coast Express Eviction and Entering a Default, or in the Alternative for Service on Defendant East Coast Express Eviction

10 Cited authorities

  1. Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia

    470 A.2d 751 (D.C. 1983)   Cited 289 times
    Concluding that this court “may refuse to adhere strictly to the plain language of a statute in order to effectuate the legislative purpose”

  2. Bax v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys

    216 F.R.D. 4 (D.D.C. 2003)   Cited 23 times
    Discussing congressional intent to relieve United States marshals of the burden of serving summonses and complaints in civil actions

  3. Office of People's Counsel v. Public Serv

    477 A.2d 1079 (D.C. 1984)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that a statute should be construed so that no part of the statute is either redundant or superfluous

  4. Albright v. United States

    631 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 35 times
    Concluding that a record need not be within a system of records to bring a claim under § 552a(e)

  5. Murray v. District of Columbia

    870 A.2d 25 (D.C. 2005)   Cited 3 times

    No. 03-CV-1155. Submitted December 13, 2004. Decided January 24, 2005. The decision in this case was originally issued as an unpublished Memorandum Opinion and Judgment on January 24, 2005. It is now being published by direction of the court. Appeal from the Superior Court, Natalia Combs Greene, J. James Murray, filed a brief pro se. Robert J. Spagnoletti, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Edward E. Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, and William J. Earl, Assistant Attorney General, filed

  6. In re Regent

    741 A.2d 40 (D.C. 1999)   Cited 4 times
    Disbarring attorney who failed to disclose material information, including a criminal charge, an ethics complaint, and involvement in three civil lawsuits, on her Arizona bar application even after the Arizona Bar Committee requested her to provide more complete information and called her attention to apparent discrepancies, and who subsequently failed to disclose the same information on a Nevada bar application

  7. Matter of Dorsey

    469 A.2d 1246 (D.C. 1983)   Cited 5 times

    No. 83-639. Submitted October 13, 1983. Decided December 14, 1983. Joseph M. Dorsey, pro se. Fred Grabowsky, Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of the Board on Professional Responsibility. Before NEBEKER, BELSON and TERRY, Associate Judges. PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility has submitted to this court its report on attorney/respondent Joseph M. Dorsey. The Board recommends disbarment for violations of D.C. Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(3)

  8. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,280 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  9. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 72,180 times   128 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

  10. Rule 55 - Default; Default Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 55   Cited 34,520 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States