6 Cited authorities

  1. Liteky v. United States

    510 U.S. 540 (1994)   Cited 7,705 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a judge's impatience and annoyance did not justify disqualification
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.

    486 U.S. 847 (1988)   Cited 2,169 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that relief from judgment is not automatic even if the presiding judge violates § 455 by failing to recuse himself
  3. U.S. v. Holland

    519 F.3d 909 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,082 times
    Holding that the two-part test is whether "a reasonable third-party observer who "understand all the relevant facts" and has examined the record and law—not a "hypersensitive or unduly suspicious person"—would conclude that there is an appearance of bias, and whether the court concludes that it cannot impartially "administer justice without respect to persons."
  4. Preston v. U.S.

    923 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 277 times
    Finding § 455(b) matter in controversy requirement satisfied when judge's former law partners represented a company that was not a party to the court case but might be liable in an indemnification proceeding if the plaintiffs prevailed in the underlying case
  5. Section 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

    28 U.S.C. § 455   Cited 11,105 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth standards of recusal
  6. Section 144 - Bias or prejudice of judge

    28 U.S.C. § 144   Cited 4,651 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring affidavits alleging bias to the "timely"