§Why CasetextPricing

Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation et al

REPLY BRIEF re MOTION to Dismiss

17 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 254,855 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 268,629 times   366 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. Phillips v. County of Allegheny

    515 F.3d 224 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 16,924 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court need not permit a curative amendment if such amendment would be futile

  4. Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.

    104 F. Supp. 2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that "non-payment of royalties should have put [plaintiff] on notice of" repudiation of plaintiff's ownership rights

  5. Palatkevich v. Choupak

    No. 12 Civ. 1681 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2014)   Cited 30 times
    Finding distinctness requirement met for association-in-fact enterprise “where the defendant ‘person’ is a natural person who works for a corporation instead of the corporation itself”

  6. Stewart v. Wachowski

    574 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (C.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 36 times
    Finding that evidence in the form of unauthenticated "web page documents" could not be considered on summary judgment motion

  7. Standard Inv. v. Nat. Assn. of Securities Dealers

    621 F. Supp. 2d 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 23 times
    In Standard Investment, the court spent considerable time discussing the framework established by the Second Circuit in Lugosch for determining whether a document is judicial.

  8. Jubelirer v. Mastercard Intern., Inc.

    68 F. Supp. 2d 1049 (W.D. Wis. 1999)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that a contractual combination for financial services failed to constitute an enterprise

  9. Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill, LLC

    340 F. Supp. 2d 1077 (C.D. Cal. 2004)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that based on § 230(e) the CDA does not apply to California's statutory and common law right of publicity claims

  10. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Ccbill LLC

    481 F.3d 751 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 5 times
    Reversing summary judgment on direct infringement claim

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,148 times   927 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 14,989 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include

  13. Section 1832 - Theft of trade secrets

    18 U.S.C. § 1832   Cited 408 times   94 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that trade secret “relate to” or be “included in” product

  14. Section 1831 - Economic espionage

    18 U.S.C. § 1831   Cited 325 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets

  15. Section 506 - Criminal offenses

    17 U.S.C. § 506   Cited 274 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing fraudulent use of copyright notice

  16. Section 2319 - Criminal infringement of a copyright

    18 U.S.C. § 2319   Cited 165 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Relating to criminal infringement of a copyright