103 Cited authorities

Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
568 U.S. 398 (2013) Cited 3,050 times 169 Legal Analyses
Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"
United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
489 U.S. 235 (1989) Cited 4,580 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that where Congress expresses its intent "with sufficient precision," then "reference to legislative history and to pre-Code practice is hardly necessary"
Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (1984) Cited 4,755 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
Heckler v. Chaney
470 U.S. 821 (1985) Cited 2,039 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute did not provide meaningful standards because it did not "speak to the criteria which shall be used by the agency for investigating possible violations of the [statute]"
Russello v. United States
464 U.S. 16 (1983) Cited 2,095 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"
City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
569 U.S. 290 (2013) Cited 560 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that Chevron applies to questions about the scope of an agency's statutory authority
Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth.
566 U.S. 449 (2012) Cited 490 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding term used in Torture Victim Protection Act was unambiguous despite disagreement among several circuits
Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
442 U.S. 330 (1979) Cited 1,156 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that "injury to business or property" was not limited to commercial interests
Bowen v. Mich. Academy of Family Physicians
476 U.S. 667 (1986) Cited 699 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the provision limiting review of amounts of benefit payments under the Medicare program did not bar review of the method by which such amounts were computed
Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
513 U.S. 374 (1995) Cited 391 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a corporation is subject to constitutional claims if, among other things, the government "retains for itself permanent authority to appoint a majority of the directors of corporation"
Section 701 - Application; definitions
5 U.S.C. § 701 Cited 9,363 times 36 Legal Analyses
Adopting the definition given in Section 551
Section 1821 - Insurance Funds
12 U.S.C. § 1821 Cited 2,938 times 54 Legal Analyses
Granting FDIC standing to bring civil actions for money damages against the Bank's directors as the successor
Section 4617 - Authority over critically undercapitalized regulated entities
12 U.S.C. § 4617 Cited 666 times 4 Legal Analyses
Granting the FHFA the power to “operate” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and “to conduct all [of their] business”
Section 1441a - Repealed
12 U.S.C. § 1441a Cited 500 times 1 Legal Analyses
Granting RTC "the same powers and rights to carry out its duties" as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has under 12 U.S.C. § 1821-1823
Section 4511 - Establishment of the Federal Housing Finance Agency
12 U.S.C. § 4511 Cited 173 times
Establishing FHFA as "an independent agency of the Federal Government"
Section 4513 - Duties and authorities of Director
12 U.S.C. § 4513 Cited 33 times
Empowering Agency to place entities like Freddie Mac into conservatorship to protect nation's housing market and participate in litigation toward same end
Section 4502 - Definitions
12 U.S.C. § 4502 Cited 18 times
Defining “conforming mortgage”

Arrowood Indemnity Company et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al

103 Cited authorities

Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

Holding that where Congress expresses its intent "with sufficient precision," then "reference to legislative history and to pre-Code practice is hardly necessary"

Holding that a statute did not provide meaningful standards because it did not "speak to the criteria which shall be used by the agency for investigating possible violations of the [statute]"

Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

Holding that Chevron applies to questions about the scope of an agency's statutory authority

Holding term used in Torture Victim Protection Act was unambiguous despite disagreement among several circuits

Holding that "injury to business or property" was not limited to commercial interests

Holding that the provision limiting review of amounts of benefit payments under the Medicare program did not bar review of the method by which such amounts were computed

Holding that a corporation is subject to constitutional claims if, among other things, the government "retains for itself permanent authority to appoint a majority of the directors of corporation"

Adopting the definition given in Section 551

Granting FDIC standing to bring civil actions for money damages against the Bank's directors as the successor

Granting the FHFA the power to “operate” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and “to conduct all [of their] business”

Granting RTC "the same powers and rights to carry out its duties" as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has under 12 U.S.C. § 1821-1823

Establishing FHFA as "an independent agency of the Federal Government"

Empowering Agency to place entities like Freddie Mac into conservatorship to protect nation's housing market and participate in litigation toward same end

Defining “conforming mortgage”