RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for clarification 37 Order on Motion to Alter Judgment PLAINTIFFS' EXPEDITED MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION THAT THE COURT'S PERMANENT INJUNCTION REQUIRES THIRD-PARTY CLOUDFLARE INC. TO CEASE ITS SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPERATIONS
351 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (W.D. Wash. 2004) Cited 70 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that even though Amazon.com "may have encouraged third parties to use the Zshops platform and provided the tools to assist them, that does not disqualify it from immunity under § 230 because the Zshops vendor ultimately decided what information to put on its site."
Finding that the plaintiff abandoned it's “halfhearted request for attorney's fees” by failing to press their case in their reply brief despite the fact that the defendants offered arguments against such relief