8 Cited authorities

  1. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

    487 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 468 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an online image search index was "highly transformative"
  2. Corbis Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    351 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (W.D. Wash. 2004)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even though Amazon.com "may have encouraged third parties to use the Zshops platform and provided the tools to assist them, that does not disqualify it from immunity under § 230 because the Zshops vendor ultimately decided what information to put on its site."
  3. Recording Indus. of Am. v. Verizon Internet

    351 F.3d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 66 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no obligation under the DMCA to provide individual subscriber information, granting Verizon's motion to quash subpoena to do so
  4. Arista Records, LLC v. Tkach

    122 F. Supp. 3d 32 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 29 times
    Finding that the plaintiff abandoned it's “halfhearted request for attorney's fees” by failing to press their case in their reply brief despite the fact that the defendants offered arguments against such relief
  5. Schenck v. Orosz

    Case No. 3:13-CV-0294 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2013)   Cited 10 times
    Acknowledging authority holding that claims premised on unregistered copyrights must be dismissed
  6. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,553 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  7. Section 502 - Remedies for infringement: Injunctions

    17 U.S.C. § 502   Cited 1,452 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing a court to enter a temporary injunction "on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain infringement of copyright"
  8. Section 512 - Limitations on liability relating to material online

    17 U.S.C. § 512   Cited 575 times   186 Legal Analyses
    Denying the safe harbor if the service provider receives "a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity"