18 Cited authorities

Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,812 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org.
426 U.S. 26 (1976) Cited 3,184 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiffs who sued IRS lacked standing where they hoped reversal of IRS rule would " ‘discourage’ hospitals from denying their services to" plaintiffs, but whether hospitals had denied services based on the existing rule remained unclear and, even if the rule were reversed, hospitals would remain free to not provide services to plaintiffs
Baker v. Carr
369 U.S. 186 (1962) Cited 5,227 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge Tennessee's apportionment of state representatives when that apportionment "effect[ed] a gross disproportion of representation to voting population"
Reynolds v. Sims
377 U.S. 533 (1964) Cited 2,829 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the Equal Protection Clause requires that the seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislature must be apportioned on a population basis"
Thornburg v. Gingles
478 U.S. 30 (1986) Cited 947 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that appellate courts can correct errors, "including those that may infect a so-called mixed finding of law and fact, or a finding of fact that is predicated on a misunderstanding of the governing rule of law"
Shaw v. Reno
509 U.S. 630 (1993) Cited 563 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the state's reapportionment plan might violate the Equal Protection Clause
Hines v. Davidowitz
312 U.S. 52 (1941) Cited 2,184 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Alien Registration Act of 1940 preempted Pennsylvania's alien registration requirements
Holder v. Hall
512 U.S. 874 (1994) Cited 216 times
Holding that the size of a governing body is not subject to a Section 2 vote dilution challenge
Roman v. Sincock
377 U.S. 695 (1964) Cited 230 times
Holding that "faithful adherence to a plan of population-based representation ... free from any taint of arbitrariness or discrimination " satisfies the Equal Protection Clause
Nipper v. Smith
39 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994) Cited 136 times
Holding that the existence of racial bias in the community is relevant to a § 2 claim

Arise for Social Justice, et al. v. City of Springfield, et al.

18 Cited authorities

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge Tennessee's apportionment of state representatives when that apportionment "effect[ed] a gross disproportion of representation to voting population"

Holding that "the Equal Protection Clause requires that the seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislature must be apportioned on a population basis"

Holding that appellate courts can correct errors, "including those that may infect a so-called mixed finding of law and fact, or a finding of fact that is predicated on a misunderstanding of the governing rule of law"

Holding that the state's reapportionment plan might violate the Equal Protection Clause

Holding that the Alien Registration Act of 1940 preempted Pennsylvania's alien registration requirements

Holding that the size of a governing body is not subject to a Section 2 vote dilution challenge

Holding that "faithful adherence to a plan of population-based representation ... free from any taint of arbitrariness or discrimination " satisfies the Equal Protection Clause

Holding that the existence of racial bias in the community is relevant to a § 2 claim