62 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,174 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,278 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,103 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  4. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. v. Breeden

    532 U.S. 268 (2001)   Cited 5,363 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the temporal proximity requirement to establish a prima facie case "between an employer's knowledge of protected activity and an adverse employment action as sufficient evidence" must be "very close"
  5. Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics

    563 U.S. 1 (2011)   Cited 624 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the phrase ‘any complaint’ suggests a broad interpretation”
  6. Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.

    534 U.S. 438 (2002)   Cited 837 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where Congress has listed some categories of people as to successor liability under 26 U.S.C. § 9706, those not included in the list are not liable because Congress could have included them "clearly and explicitly"
  7. Herman v. RSR Sec. Servs. Ltd.

    172 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,067 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer willfully violated the FLSA when he had "extensive knowledge" of the FLSA's requirements, knew of previous violations, and relied on assurances by corporate decisionmakers despite their prior illegal activities
  8. Fischbach v. D.C. Dep. of Corr

    86 F.3d 1180 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 531 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff failed to establish that the employer's proffered nondiscriminatory reason was pretextual
  9. Carter v. Dutchess Cmty. Coll.

    735 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 579 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the FLSA might apply to an inmate working as a community college tutor for classes taught inside a prison
  10. Donovan v. Agnew

    712 F.2d 1509 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 424 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding salaried employees not entitled to minimum wages despite failure of employer to pay their contractual wages during last two weeks of company's operation
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,681 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 201 - Short title

    29 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 20,915 times   102 Legal Analyses
    Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
  13. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,458 times   225 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules
  14. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 8,812 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  15. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 6,787 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable
  16. Section 255 - Statute of limitations

    29 U.S.C. § 255   Cited 4,536 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that not all FLSA wage and overtime claims are willful
  17. Section 215 - Prohibited acts; prima facie evidence

    29 U.S.C. § 215   Cited 2,638 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing as a protected activity an individual's “testif[ying] ... in any such proceeding” “under or related to this chapter”
  18. Section 202 - Congressional finding and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 202   Cited 1,108 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that domestic service employees affect commerce
  19. Section 12-301 - Limitation of time for bringing actions

    D.C. Code § 12-301   Cited 903 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a three-year statute of limitations on actions "for the recovery of personal property"
  20. Section 2-1401.01 - Intent of Council

    D.C. Code § 2-1401.01   Cited 282 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Protecting against discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, familial status, family responsibilities, matriculation, political affiliation, genetic information, disability, source of income, status as a victim of intrafamily offense, and place of residence or business"
  21. Section 531.52 - General restrictions on an employer's use of its employees' tips

    29 C.F.R. § 531.52   Cited 112 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a customer's tipping of a server to be "free of any control by the employer"
  22. Section 531.59 - The tip wage credit

    29 C.F.R. § 531.59   Cited 108 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Numbering added for clarity
  23. Section 531.54 - Tip pooling

    29 C.F.R. § 531.54   Cited 68 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that bus boys who assist servers but who customarily do not directly receive diner-donated gratuities may properly be included in an employer-mandated tip pool
  24. Section 516.28 - Tipped employees and employer-administered tip pools

    29 C.F.R. § 516.28   Cited 47 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to keep records for its tipped employees of "[h]ours worked each workday in any occupation in which the employee does not receive tips, and total daily or weekly straight-time payment made by the employer for such hours," and "[h]ours worked each workday in occupations in which the employee receives tips, and total daily or weekly straight-time earnings for such hours"
  25. Section 531.50 - Statutory provisions with respect to tipped employees

    29 C.F.R. § 531.50   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the cash wage is $2.13 an hour
  26. Section 4.167 - Wage payments-medium of payment

    29 C.F.R. § 4.167

    The wage payment requirements under the Act for monetary wages specified under its provisions will be satisfied by the timely payment of such wages to the employee either in cash or negotiable instrument payable at par. Such payment must be made finally and unconditionally and "free and clear." Scrip, tokens, credit cards, "dope checks", coupons, salvage material, and similar devices which permit the employer to retain and prevent the employee from acquiring control of money due for the work until