8 Cited authorities

Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.
7 Cal.4th 503 (Cal. 1994) Cited 1,174 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that there is no separate cause of action for civil conspiracy, and that to establish such an action, a plaintiff must show some other underlying tort or civil wrong
Arachnid, Inc. v. Merit Industries, Inc.
939 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1991) Cited 171 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "shall be the property of [Arachnid], and all rights thereto will be assigned by IDEA ... to [Arachnid]" was not a present assignment
Quintilliani v. Mannerino
62 Cal.App.4th 54 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 91 times
Holding that one-year statute of limitations set forth in section 340.6 applies to claims of breach of fiduciary duty when the fiduciary obligation arises from the attorney-client relationship
Stoll v. Superior Court
9 Cal.App.4th 1362 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) Cited 66 times
Concluding one-year statute of limitations governed malpractice claims even if characterized as breach of fiduciary duty
McGEHEE v. COE NEWNES/McGEHEE ULC
No. C 03-5145 MJJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2004) Cited 3 times
Relying on Marin Tug to dismiss intentional interference with prospective economic relations claim because defendants could not be characterized as "strangers" to the business relationship
Jones v. Kelly
208 Cal. 251 (Cal. 1929) Cited 52 times
In Jones the breach consisted of the tortious termination of a water supply by a landlord who had contracted to provide water.
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 90,278 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 402 Cited 6,634 times 10 Legal Analyses
Providing relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court

Applera Corporation - Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc. et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding that there is no separate cause of action for civil conspiracy, and that to establish such an action, a plaintiff must show some other underlying tort or civil wrong

Holding that "shall be the property of [Arachnid], and all rights thereto will be assigned by IDEA ... to [Arachnid]" was not a present assignment

Holding that one-year statute of limitations set forth in section 340.6 applies to claims of breach of fiduciary duty when the fiduciary obligation arises from the attorney-client relationship

Concluding one-year statute of limitations governed malpractice claims even if characterized as breach of fiduciary duty

Relying on Marin Tug to dismiss intentional interference with prospective economic relations claim because defendants could not be characterized as "strangers" to the business relationship

In Jones the breach consisted of the tortious termination of a water supply by a landlord who had contracted to provide water.

Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

Providing relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court