§Why CasetextPricing

Applera Corporation - Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc. et al

Memorandum in Opposition re MOTION in Limine No. 4 to Exclude AB's Reliance on the Late-Produced UK Patent to Carr and Cosstick

3 Cited authorities

  1. Wilson Sporting Goods v. David Geoffrey

    904 F.2d 677 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding ensnarement to be an issue of law reviewed de novo

  2. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,850 times   319 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  3. Section 282 - Presumption of validity; defenses

    35 U.S.C. § 282   Cited 3,895 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Granting a presumption of validity to patents