21 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 12,290 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party seeking a preliminary injunction "must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest"
  2. Ricci v. DeStefano

    557 U.S. 557 (2009)   Cited 2,422 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a city's making promotion decisions based on race would violate Title VII without a "valid defense"
  3. Phillips v. AWH Corp.

    415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 4,950 times   151 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "because extrinsic evidence can help educate the court regarding the field of the invention and can help the court determine what a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand claim terms to mean, it is permissible for the district court in its sound discretion to admit and use such evidence"
  4. Salazar v. Buono

    559 U.S. 700 (2010)   Cited 163 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Buono v. Kempthorne , 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), and Buono v. Kempthorne , 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)
  5. Church v. City of Huntsville

    30 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1994)   Cited 602 times
    Holding that "the plaintiffs have failed to establish the existence of a municipal policy or a pervasive practice that could serve as a predicate to municipal liability under section 1983" and that "[t]herefore, they have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits"
  6. Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.

    566 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 182 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "it is not clear to what extent, if any, the doctrine applicable to obviousness should be modified to conform to the approach adopted by this court in Egyptian Goddess" and that the application of KSR to design patents is "new and untested ground"
  7. Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

    678 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 144 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant must make a clear showing of likelihood of irreparable harm
  8. Lankford v. Sherman

    451 F.3d 496 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 147 times
    Finding no private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1396a
  9. Standard Havens Products v. Gencor Industries

    897 F.2d 511 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 141 times
    Determining that "employee layoffs, immediate insolvency, and possible extinction" constituted irreparable harm to a company
  10. Regents of the University of California v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

    747 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 147 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding per se treatment likely applicable where "[b]y any account, the purpose and effect of the horizontal restraints imposed . . . have little, if any, bearing on the operative rules"
  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 16,778 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  12. Rule 41 - Mandate: Contents; Issuance and Effective Date; Stay

    Fed. R. App. P. 41   Cited 1,967 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Occurring seven days after resolution of any petition for rehearing, or after the time for such a petition has elapsed
  13. Section 1.84 - Standards for drawings

    37 C.F.R. § 1.84   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that exploded views "show the relationship or order of assembly of various parts"