§Why CasetextPricing

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

RESPONSE

21 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,740 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Ricci v. DeStefano

    557 U.S. 557 (2009)   Cited 3,052 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a city's making promotion decisions based on race would violate Title VII without a "valid defense"

  3. Phillips v. AWH Corp.

    415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 5,701 times   164 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "because extrinsic evidence can help educate the court regarding the field of the invention and can help the court determine what a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand claim terms to mean, it is permissible for the district court in its sound discretion to admit and use such evidence"

  4. Salazar v. Buono

    559 U.S. 700 (2010)   Cited 220 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Buono v. Kempthorne , 527 F.3d 758 (9th Cir. 2008), and Buono v. Kempthorne , 502 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2007)

  5. Church v. City of Huntsville

    30 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1994)   Cited 722 times
    Holding that one 1991 study's single use of the word "rousted" was "not conclusive" as to the existence of City effort to expel the homeless in 1993

  6. Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.

    566 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 222 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "it is not clear to what extent, if any, the doctrine applicable to obviousness should be modified to conform to the approach adopted by this court in Egyptian Goddess" and that the application of KSR to design patents is "new and untested ground"

  7. Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

    678 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 177 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant must make a clear showing of likelihood of irreparable harm

  8. Lankford v. Sherman

    451 F.3d 496 (8th Cir. 2006)   Cited 170 times
    Finding no private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1396a

  9. Standard Havens Products v. Gencor Industries

    897 F.2d 511 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 151 times
    Determining that "employee layoffs, immediate insolvency, and possible extinction" constituted irreparable harm to a company

  10. Regents of the University of California v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

    747 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding per se treatment likely applicable where "[b]y any account, the purpose and effect of the horizontal restraints imposed . . . have little, if any, bearing on the operative rules"

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,345 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  12. Rule 41 - Mandate: Contents; Issuance and Effective Date; Stay

    Fed. R. App. P. 41   Cited 2,650 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[t]he court may shorten ... by order" the time for issuing its mandate

  13. Section 1.84 - Standards for drawings

    37 C.F.R. § 1.84   Cited 20 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that exploded views "show the relationship or order of assembly of various parts"