25 Cited authorities

Taylor v. Sturgell
553 U.S. 880 (2008) Cited 3,159 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."
Arizona v. California
460 U.S. 605 (1983) Cited 2,209 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights
Blonder-Tongue v. University Foundation
402 U.S. 313 (1971) Cited 2,221 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding issue preclusion inappropriate when "without fault of his own the [party to be precluded] was deprived of crucial evidence or witnesses in the first litigation"
Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc.
494 U.S. 545 (1990) Cited 404 times
Holding that plaintiff's Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury of his § 1981 claim was infringed where collateral estoppel effect was given to the trial court's adverse findings on his Title VII claim
Walker, Inc. v. Food Machinery
382 U.S. 172 (1965) Cited 876 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that there may be a violation of the Sherman Act when a patent is procured by fraud, but recognizing that a patent is an exception to the general rule against monopolies
Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.
141 F.3d 1059 (Fed. Cir. 1998) Cited 340 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hether conduct in the prosecution of a patent is sufficient to strip a patentee of its immunity from the antitrust laws" implicates the Federal Circuit's "exclusive jurisdiction" and, accordingly, should be decided under the law of that circuit
Hamilton v. Leavy
322 F.3d 776 (3d Cir. 2003) Cited 209 times
Holding that questions of fact about the manner in which prison officials executed court orders may defeat absolute immunity
In re City of Philadelphia Litigation
158 F.3d 711 (3d Cir. 1998) Cited 232 times
Holding that we "will not reconsider questions that another panel has decided on a prior appeal in the same case" absent "extraordinary circumstances"
Pharmacy Benefit v. Caremarkspcs, Inc.
582 F.3d 432 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 146 times
Holding that transferee judge's order vacating transferor judge's order—without justification—violated the law of the case doctrine
Pharmacia Upjohn Co. v. Mylan Pharm
170 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 1999) Cited 174 times 5 Legal Analyses
Finding the weight of authority in agreement that a judgment is final for estoppel purposes notwithstanding the filing of post-trial motions.
Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials
Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 Cited 9,234 times 24 Legal Analyses
Granting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."

Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc. et al

25 Cited authorities

Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."

Holding that res judicata barred re-opening the quantification of tribes' Winters rights

Holding issue preclusion inappropriate when "without fault of his own the [party to be precluded] was deprived of crucial evidence or witnesses in the first litigation"

Holding that plaintiff's Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury of his § 1981 claim was infringed where collateral estoppel effect was given to the trial court's adverse findings on his Title VII claim

Holding that there may be a violation of the Sherman Act when a patent is procured by fraud, but recognizing that a patent is an exception to the general rule against monopolies

Holding that "[w]hether conduct in the prosecution of a patent is sufficient to strip a patentee of its immunity from the antitrust laws" implicates the Federal Circuit's "exclusive jurisdiction" and, accordingly, should be decided under the law of that circuit

Holding that questions of fact about the manner in which prison officials executed court orders may defeat absolute immunity

Holding that we "will not reconsider questions that another panel has decided on a prior appeal in the same case" absent "extraordinary circumstances"

Holding that transferee judge's order vacating transferor judge's order—without justification—violated the law of the case doctrine

Finding the weight of authority in agreement that a judgment is final for estoppel purposes notwithstanding the filing of post-trial motions.

Granting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."