§Why CasetextPricing

Apodaca v. Colorado Nonprofit Development Center

BRIEF in Support of 79 MOTION for Summary Judgment

7 Cited authorities

  1. Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co.

    70 P.3d 495 (Colo. App. 2003)   Cited 32 times
    In Archer, the plaintiff asserted an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against his employer following his termination.

  2. Christen-Loper v. Bret's Electric, LLC

    175 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (D. Colo. 2016)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that this was "entirely consistent with the Colorado Supreme Court's holding that the CADA does not preempt otherwise available remedies."

  3. Llewellyn v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, Llc.

    Civil Action No. 08-cv-00179-WJM-KLM (D. Colo. May. 5, 2015)   Cited 4 times

    Civil Action No. 08-cv-00179-WJM-KLM 05-05-2015 GLEN LLEWELLYN, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC., and NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC., Defendants. Judge William J. Martínez Judge William J. Martínez ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE Defendants Ocwen Loan Serving, LLC, and Nomura Credit and Capital, Inc. (together, "Defendants") move in limine to exclude any evidence or testimony from Plaintiff Glen Llewellyn ("Llewellyn") regarding (a) financial losses allegedly caused by Defendants

  4. Schlenker v. City of Arvada, Colorado

    Civil Action No. 09-cv-01189-WDM-KLM (D. Colo. Jun. 2, 2010)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that the plaintiff's own description of his suffering "leaves little doubt that he contends that the incident at issue deeply and irretrievably affected him"

  5. Franklin v. Shelton

    250 F.2d 92 (10th Cir. 1958)   Cited 65 times
    Explaining that "where injuries complained of are of such character to require skilled and professional persons to determine the cause and extent thereof, they must be proved by the testimony of medical experts."

  6. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,380 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  7. Section 13-21-102 - Exemplary damages

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-102   Cited 352 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "the court may increase any award of exemplary damages, to a sum not to exceed three times the amount of actual damages, if it is shown that ... [t]he defendant has continued the behavior or repeated the action which is the subject of the claim against the defendant in a willful and wanton manner, either against the plaintiff or another person or persons, during the pendency of the case."