§Why CasetextPricing

Anza Technology, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Incorporated

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,933 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  2. Macronix Int'l Co. v. Spansion Inc.

    4 F. Supp. 3d 797 (E.D. Va. 2014)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that for direct infringement it is insufficient under Twombly/Iqbal to "simply allege[] that each element of a cited claim is infringed and then parrot the claim language for each element"

  3. Atlas IP, LLC v. Exelon Corp.

    189 F. Supp. 3d 768 (N.D. Ill. 2016)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "factual allegations that do not permit a court to infer that the accused product infringes each element of at least one claim are not suggestive of infringement—they are merely compatible with infringement"

  4. Solis v. City of Fresno

    1:11-CV-00053 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012)   Cited 23 times

    1:11-CV-00053 AWI GSA 03-12-2012 SHANDRA SOLIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 35) INTRODUCTION On December 8, 2011, Plaintiff Shandra Solis filed a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") against Defendants City of Fresno, Officer David Fries ("Officer Fries") and Detective John Gomez ("Detective Gomez"). See Court's Docket, Doc. No. 34. Plaintiff brings claims for (1) violation of her right to equal protection;

  5. Mike Murphy's Enters., Inc. v. Fineline Indus., LLC

    1:16-cv-784-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2016)   Cited 1 times

    1:16-cv-784-LJO-SAB 08-04-2016 MIKE MURPHY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. FINELINE INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendant. Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 5) I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL Judges in the Eastern District of California carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation, and this Court is unable to devote inordinate time and resources to individual cases and matters. Given the shortage of district

  6. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,619 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  7. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,952 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  8. Section 271 - Infringement of patent

    35 U.S.C. § 271   Cited 6,184 times   1084 Legal Analyses
    Holding that testing is a "use"