§Why CasetextPricing

Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re:

10 Cited authorities

  1. First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior de Cuba

    462 U.S. 611 (1983)   Cited 544 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the instrumentality was the alter ego of the sovereign, and refusing to give effect to the instrumentality's separate juridical status

  2. Blockbuster, Inc. v. Galeno

    472 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 330 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party need only show "to a reasonable probability" that the aggregate claims exceed $5 million

  3. Tanoh v. Dow Chemical Co.

    561 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 111 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that CAFA's requirement of 100 or more plaintiffs refers only to actual, named plaintiffs

  4. Stan Winston Creatures, Inc. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc.

    314 F. Supp. 2d 177 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 131 times
    Finding a "defendant may not use removal proceedings as an occasion to adjudicate the substantive issues of a case." (quoting 14B Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice & Procedure § 3721 at 331 (3d ed. 1998))

  5. R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc.

    612 F.2d 651 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 223 times
    Holding that purpose of amendment was to eradicate "the evil whereby a local institution, engaged in a local business and in many cases locally owned, is enabled to bring its litigation into the Federal courts simply because it has obtained a corporate charter from another state."

  6. DiTolla v. Doral Dental IPA of New York, LLC

    469 F.3d 271 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutorily prescribed period runs from the date that the application for leave to appeal is granted

  7. Louisiana v. Allstate

    536 F.3d 418 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 66 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding State of Louisiana was real party in interest to claims for injunctive relief under Louisiana's antitrust statute

  8. Anirudh v. Citimortgage, Inc.

    598 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 20 times

    No. 08 Civ. 3081 (WCC). February 11, 2009. Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Greene, P.C., Jeffrey S. Greene, Esq., of Counsel, White Plains, NY, Law Offices of Sanford F. Young, P.C., Sanford F. Young, Esq., of Counsel, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Mayer Brown LLP, Michael O. Ware, Esq., Kwaku A. Akowuah, Esq., of Counsel, New York, NY, Lucia Nale, Esq., of Counsel, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER CONNER, Senior District Judge.Page 1 Plaintiffs Tony L. Anirudh and Dianne

  9. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. Walters

    CASE NO.: 1:08cv196-MEF (WO) (M.D. Ala. Mar. 5, 2009)   Cited 1 times

    CASE NO.: 1:08cv196-MEF (WO). March 5, 2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK FULLER, District Judge This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Remand (Doc. # 13) filed on April 18, 2008, by Plaintiff Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. ("Palm Harbor"). Defendants Michael Walters, Jennifer Walters, and Chester Driskell removed this action from the Circuit Court for Coffee County, Alabama on March 19, 2008, invoking this Court's subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). For several

  10. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,364 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"