In re Bextra Celebrex Marketing Sales Practice
524 F. Supp. 2d 1166 (N.D. Cal. 2007) Cited 46 timesHolding that experts may not "cherry-pick []" observational studies to support a conclusion that is contradicted by randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses of such trials, and meta-analyses of observational studies and excluding an expert who "ignores the vast majority of the evidence in favor of the few studies that support her conclusion"
DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co., Ltd.
No. C-99-2690-DLJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2003) Cited 17 timesHolding that in the damages context, an expert's methodology is reliable if the grounds used by that expert to calculate damages were legally acceptable
Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses
Fed. R. Evid. 702 Cited 27,831 times 287 Legal AnalysesAdopting the Daubert standard