9 Cited authorities

Mine Workers v. Bagwell
512 U.S. 821 (1994) Cited 1,388 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court's imposition of a fine is punitive if the contemnor has no opportunity to purge it through some action other than full payment once imposed
United States v. Mine Workers
330 U.S. 258 (1947) Cited 2,632 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order
Paramedics Electromedicina Comercial, Ltda. v. GE Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc.
369 F.3d 645 (2d Cir. 2004) Cited 420 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court's "finding of contempt was not an abuse of discretion" where the party "did not diligently attempt to comply with the district court's orders in a reasonable manner"
Bano v. Union Carbide Corp.
361 F.3d 696 (2d Cir. 2004) Cited 186 times
Holding that an "organization lacks standing to assert claims of injunctive relief on behalf of its members where 'the fact and extent' of the injury that gives rise to the claims for injunctive relief 'would require individualized proof'" (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 515-16)
Timken Co. v. United States
341 U.S. 593 (1951) Cited 256 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Timken, as in the present case, it was argued that the restraints were reasonable steps incident to a valid trademark licensing system.
Vanity Fair Mills v. T. Eaton Co.
234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956) Cited 360 times 11 Legal Analyses
Finding that the "power to enjoin . . . should be exercised with great reluctance when it will be difficult to secure compliance with any resulting decree or when the exercise of such power is fraught with possibilities of discord and conflict with the authorities of another country."
McKusick v. City of Melbourne, Florida
96 F.3d 478 (11th Cir. 1996) Cited 61 times
Finding § 1983 liability could exist where the decision of how and when to enforce an injunction resulted in deprivation of constitutional rights
In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litig.
810 F. Supp. 2d 522 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) Cited 12 times 3 Legal Analyses
No. 06–MD–1738 (BMC)(JO). 2011-09-6 In re VITAMIN C ANTITRUST LITIGATION.This document refers to: All Actions. Only a few months earlier, the Ministry had issued regulations (“the 2002 Regulations”), which repealed, as of January 1, 2002, another directive that had subjected vitamin C and other products to export licensing and export quotas beginning on December 29, 1992 (the “1992 Interim Regulations”). According to the 2002 PVC Notice, “[t]he adoption of PVC procedure shall be convenient for exporters
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. S. Fla. Water
280 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 2002) Cited 18 times
Concluding that "addition . . . to navigable waters" includes pumping polluted water from one navigable water body into another

Animal Science Products, Inc. et al v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. et al

9 Cited authorities

Holding that a court's imposition of a fine is punitive if the contemnor has no opportunity to purge it through some action other than full payment once imposed

Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order

Holding that the district court's "finding of contempt was not an abuse of discretion" where the party "did not diligently attempt to comply with the district court's orders in a reasonable manner"

Holding that an "organization lacks standing to assert claims of injunctive relief on behalf of its members where 'the fact and extent' of the injury that gives rise to the claims for injunctive relief 'would require individualized proof'" (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 515-16)

In Timken, as in the present case, it was argued that the restraints were reasonable steps incident to a valid trademark licensing system.

Finding that the "power to enjoin . . . should be exercised with great reluctance when it will be difficult to secure compliance with any resulting decree or when the exercise of such power is fraught with possibilities of discord and conflict with the authorities of another country."

Finding § 1983 liability could exist where the decision of how and when to enforce an injunction resulted in deprivation of constitutional rights

Concluding that "addition . . . to navigable waters" includes pumping polluted water from one navigable water body into another