21 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,544 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,461 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Arbaugh v. Y H Corp.

    546 U.S. 500 (2006)   Cited 7,805 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title VII's numerosity requirement is nonjurisdictional even though it serves the important policy goal of “spar[ing] very small businesses from Title VII liability”
  4. Roseboro v. Garrison

    528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975)   Cited 9,187 times
    Holding that court must provide notice of requirements of summary judgment rule before granting summary judgment against pro se litigant
  5. Kerns v. U.S.

    585 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,363 times
    Holding that “when the defendant challenges the veracity of the facts underpinning subject matter jurisdiction, the trial court may go beyond the complaint, conduct evidentiary proceedings, and resolve the disputed jurisdictional facts,” and “when the jurisdictional facts are inextricably intertwined with those central to the merits, the court should resolve the relevant factual disputes only after appropriate discovery”
  6. Leeke v. Timmerman

    454 U.S. 83 (1981)   Cited 651 times
    Holding that a private party has no right to compel enforcement of criminal laws
  7. Adams v. Bain

    697 F.2d 1213 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 2,316 times
    Holding that "where the jurisdictional facts are intertwined with the facts central to the merits of the dispute, . . . the entire factual dispute is appropriately resolved only by a proceeding on the merits" and it is inappropriate to dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
  8. Warren v. Sessoms & Rogers, P.A.

    676 F.3d 365 (4th Cir. 2012)   Cited 165 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Rule 68 offer of judgment moots a case
  9. Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of Chesapeake

    910 F. Supp. 2d 861 (E.D. Va. 2012)   Cited 21 times
    In Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of Chesapeake, 910 F.Supp.2d 861, 871, n. 8 (E.D.Va. 2012), the Court stated, "the Court must have before it a properly pled claim over which it has an independent basis for exercising original jurisdiction before it may act pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act."
  10. Rashad v. Jenkins

    Civil Action No. 3:15cv655 (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2016)   Cited 9 times
    Collecting federal circuit court cases
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,715 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 241 - Conspiracy against rights

    18 U.S.C. § 241   Cited 4,185 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing civil-rights violations
  13. Section 3771 - Crime victims' rights

    18 U.S.C. § 3771   Cited 1,957 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Granting crime victim, crime victim's lawful representative and "the attorney for the Government" the right to assert the crime victim's CVRA rights
  14. Section 6.2-203 - Contracts and securities from illegal currency dealing void; recovery of payments

    Va. Code § 6.2-203

    A. All contracts and securities that originate from, or are made or obtained in whole or in part by means of any illegal currency dealing, trade, or business, shall be void. B. If any person pays any money or other valuable consideration on account of any contract or security originating from, or made or obtained in whole or in part by means of, any illegal currency dealing, trade, or business, such person or his representative or assignee may recover the amount or value of such payment from the