No. 2:13-cv-0684 KJM DAD PS 07-24-2013 JOSEPH ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. STRIKES UNLIMITED, DOUG BROWN, Defendants. DALE A. DROZD ORDER Plaintiff Joseph Allen is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted an in forma pauperis application that make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)
In multidistrict copyright infringement actions, the District Court, Roger D. Foley, J., held that: (1) the plaintiff's first amended complaint was subject to dismissal for lack of clarity, and (2) the complaints would be dismissed with prejudice because of the plaintiff's long history of noncompliance with court orders and continuous assertion of frivolous grounds. Dismissed. Michael R. Wood, pro se. ORDER DISMISSING ACTIONS WITH PREJUDICE ROGER D. FOLEY, District Judge. On April 28, 1981, the Judicial
(a)General. (1) With respect to a work published before January 1, 1978, copyright was secured, or the right to secure it was lost, except for works seeking ad interim copyright, at the date of publication, i.e., the date on which copies are first placed on sale, sold, or publicly distributed, depending upon the adequacy of the notice of copyright on the work at that time. The adequacy of the copyright notice for such a work is determined by the copyright statute as it existed on the date of first
(a)General. (1) This section concerns renewal for copyrights originally secured from January 1, 1964, through December 31, 1977, either by publication with the required copyright notice or by registration as an unpublished work. Renewal registration for these works is optional. As provided in Pub. L. No. 102-307 , 106 Stat. 264, enacted June 26, 1992, renewal registration made during the last year of the original 28-year term of copyright differs in legal effect from renewal registration made during