550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 283,705 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that because "a plaintiff must show . . . a primary violation by the controlled person" in order to "establish a prima facie case of control[-]person liability," a plaintiff who "fails to allege any primary violation . . . cannot establish control[-]person liability"
Holding that a plaintiff need only "alleged specific facts sufficient to plausibly suggest that the parallel conduct alleged was the result of an agreement among the defendants"
Holding that a manufacturer's breach of a distributorship agreement was not anticompetitive because the manufacturer "expected to perform the second level service more efficiently than the old trading partners"
Holding that a non-signatory was not bound by an arbitral award where the plaintiff failed to adduce facts that would support an alter ego theory or any other theory on which a non-signatory can be forced to arbitrate
643 F. Supp. 2d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) Cited 126 times
Holding that for tortious interference of contract claims, a plaintiff must show "that there would not have been a breach but for the activities of the defendant"