31 Cited authorities

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 265,756 times 364 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Taylor v. Sturgell
553 U.S. 880 (2008) Cited 3,150 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."
Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
116 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1997) Cited 1,903 times
Holding that employees "who have not suffered an injury in that they have been covered by Medicare for the medical care they have received retain a sufficient interest in this action for purposes of the Constitutional 'case or controversy' requirement"
Exergen Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Cited 674 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegation that "Exergen, its agents and/or attorneys . . . knew of the material information and deliberately withheld or misrepresented it" without naming "the specific individual associated with the filing or prosecution of the application" was not sufficiently particular to satisfy the "who" element of an inequitable conduct claim
Snow v. Directv, Inc.
450 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2006) Cited 695 times
Holding that the plaintiff's "vague and conclusory allegations" presented in his complaint were insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over a defendant
Oxford Asset Management, Ltd. v. Jaharis
297 F.3d 1182 (11th Cir. 2002) Cited 756 times
Holding conclusory allegations are insufficient to state a claim
In re Piper Aircraft Corp.
244 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2001) Cited 430 times
Holding that the facts at issue in the contested suit "were neither raised nor litigated in the" first action
Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc.
276 F.3d 160 (3d Cir. 2001) Cited 216 times
Holding that the Lanham Act did not impair a state insurance statute that did not authorize a private cause of action because even though the state statute was "enforceable only by the State Commissioner of Insurance and confers no private right of action . . . state law actions for deceit and fraud in connection with the insurance industry are not barred, and are available to provide remedies for victims of illegal insurance practices"
Griswold v. Cty. of Hillsborough
598 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir. 2010) Cited 115 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding sole shareholder in privity with entity
Norfolk Southern Corp. v. Chevron, U.S.A
371 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 123 times
Holding that "to preclude a wider range of matters than those specified in the Agreement would frustrate the parties' expressed intent and bestow upon [the defendant] a windfall of immunity from litigation"
Section 95.031 - Computation of time
Fla. Stat. § 95.031 Cited 626 times 9 Legal Analyses
Delaying the start of the four-year limitations period for actions "founded upon fraud" until "the facts giving rise to the cause of action were discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence"

Amron v. 3m Minnesota Mining & Manufactering Company et al

31 Cited authorities

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that adequate representation requires that "[t]he interests of the nonparty and her representative are aligned" and "the party understood herself to be acting in a representative capacity."

Holding that employees "who have not suffered an injury in that they have been covered by Medicare for the medical care they have received retain a sufficient interest in this action for purposes of the Constitutional 'case or controversy' requirement"

Holding that the plaintiff's "vague and conclusory allegations" presented in his complaint were insufficient to establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over a defendant

Holding conclusory allegations are insufficient to state a claim

Holding that the facts at issue in the contested suit "were neither raised nor litigated in the" first action

Finding sole shareholder in privity with entity

Holding that "to preclude a wider range of matters than those specified in the Agreement would frustrate the parties' expressed intent and bestow upon [the defendant] a windfall of immunity from litigation"

Delaying the start of the four-year limitations period for actions "founded upon fraud" until "the facts giving rise to the cause of action were discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence"