68 Cited authorities

Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,874 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Los Angeles v. Lyons
461 U.S. 95 (1983) Cited 7,516 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
Alexander v. Sandoval
532 U.S. 275 (2001) Cited 2,644 times 35 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is "beyond dispute" that banning discrimination " ‘on the ground of race’ " "prohibits only intentional discrimination"
Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (1984) Cited 4,763 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
Valley Forge College v. Americans United
454 U.S. 464 (1982) Cited 4,972 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"
Whitmore v. Arkansas
495 U.S. 149 (1990) Cited 2,854 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"
Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n
432 U.S. 333 (1977) Cited 4,438 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading
Raines v. Byrd
521 U.S. 811 (1997) Cited 1,769 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding specifically and only that "individual members of Congress [lack] Article III standing"
Texas v. United States
523 U.S. 296 (1998) Cited 1,472 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim that "rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all" is not ripe for adjudication
Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org.
426 U.S. 26 (1976) Cited 3,186 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiffs who sued IRS lacked standing where they hoped reversal of IRS rule would " ‘discourage’ hospitals from denying their services to" plaintiffs, but whether hospitals had denied services based on the existing rule remained unclear and, even if the rule were reversed, hospitals would remain free to not provide services to plaintiffs
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 346,412 times 923 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 552a - Records maintained on individuals
5 U.S.C. § 552a Cited 4,438 times 47 Legal Analyses
Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities
Section 114 - Transportation Security Administration
49 U.S.C. § 114 Cited 201 times 10 Legal Analyses
Granting the TSA authority to prescribe regulations prohibiting the disclosure of information if such disclosure would be detrimental to transportation security

American Federation of Government Employees et al v. Hawley et al

68 Cited authorities

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold

Holding that it is "beyond dispute" that banning discrimination " ‘on the ground of race’ " "prohibits only intentional discrimination"

Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"

Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"

Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading

Holding specifically and only that "individual members of Congress [lack] Article III standing"

Holding that a claim that "rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all" is not ripe for adjudication

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Finding that it is a Department of Justice component that has as its principal function the enforcement of criminal laws includ[ing] correctional authorities

Granting the TSA authority to prescribe regulations prohibiting the disclosure of information if such disclosure would be detrimental to transportation security