§Why CasetextPricing

American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration

MOTION for Attorney Fees AND LITIGATION COSTS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT

38 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,574 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. Blum v. Stenson

    465 U.S. 886 (1984)   Cited 8,817 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting is “to be calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community, regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by private or nonprofit counsel”

  3. Moreno v. Sacramento

    534 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,257 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may impose a discretionary 10 percent "haircut"

  4. Gates v. Deukmejian

    987 F.2d 1392 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 1,683 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by applying exception to the forum rule where local counsel were unavailable

  5. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.

    526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 1,986 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting 12 factors for consideration in attorney’s fees cases

  6. Sorenson v. Mink

    239 F.3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 765 times
    Holding that a court can use its discretion to evaluate the reasonableness of the number of hours claimed by a prevailing party

  7. Dang v. Cross

    422 F.3d 800 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 515 times
    Holding that a district court's formulation of jury instructions in a civil case is reviewed for abuse of discretion

  8. Davis v. City and County of San Francisco

    976 F.2d 1536 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 596 times
    Holding that prevailing civil rights counsel are entitled to compensation for work that is "directly and intimately related to the successful representation of a client"

  9. Prison Legal News v. Schwarzenegger

    608 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 333 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fees for monitoring of settlement agreement may be awarded pursuant to § 1988

  10. Davy v. Central Intelligence Agency

    550 F.3d 1155 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 146 times
    Holding that fourth factor weighed against agency where agency took more than one year to process documents and provided no legal basis in response to a second FOIA request

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,171 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  12. Section 952 - Importation of controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 952   Cited 4,118 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting importation of controlled substances into the United States

  13. Section 812 - Schedules of controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 812   Cited 2,814 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing heroin

  14. Section 0.100 - General functions

    28 C.F.R. § 0.100   Cited 111 times
    Assigning to the DEA the "functions vested in the Attorney General by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, as amended''

  15. Section 3349 - Restricted Housing Records

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15 § 3349   Cited 9 times

    (a) A CDC Form 114, Isolation Log (rev: 3/03), shall be maintained in each Restricted Housing Unit. One Isolation Log may serve two or more special purpose units which are administered and supervised by the same staff members. (b) A separate record shall be maintained for each inmate assigned to RHU. This record shall be compiled on an automated Restricted Housing Record (Rev. 11/23), which is incorporated by reference, and shall include all required identifying information. Additionally, all significant

  16. Section 1312.11 - Requirement of authorization to import

    21 C.F.R. § 1312.11   Cited 3 times

    (a) No person shall import, or cause to be imported, into the customs territory of the United States from any place outside thereof (but within the United States), or into the United States from any place outside thereof, any controlled substances listed in Schedule I or II, or any narcotic controlled substance listed in Schedule III, IV, or V, or any non-narcotic controlled substance listed in Schedule III which the Administrator has specifically designated by regulation in § 1312.30 or any non-narcotic

  17. Section 3349.1.1 - Definitions. [Repealed]

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15 § 3349.1.1   Cited 2 times

    Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 15, § 3349.1.1 Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 190, 3600, 3601, 3602, 3603, 3605, 3607, 3700, 3700.5, 3701, 3702, 3703, 3704 and 5054, Penal Code; and Baze v. Rees (2008) 553 U.S. 35. 1. New section filed 7-30-2010; operative 8-29-2010 (Register 2010, No. 31). 2. Change without regulatory effect repealing section filed 11-5-2015 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2015, No. 45).