11 Cited authorities

Zadvydas v. Davis
533 U.S. 678 (2001) Cited 4,256 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Government's detention authority under Section 1231 is authorized for "a period reasonably necessary to secure removal"
Eisen v. Carlisle Jacquelin
417 U.S. 156 (1974) Cited 3,760 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that individual notice to class members identifiable through reasonable efforts is mandatory in (b) actions
Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop ex rel. Peters
229 F.3d 877 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 2,678 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a motion for reconsideration "may not be used to raise arguments or present evidence for first time when they could reasonably have been raised earlier in the litigation"
389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold
179 F.3d 656 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 1,437 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "vague claims" cannot generate a factual dispute "adequate to defeat summary judgment"
Carroll v. Nakatani
342 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 1,143 times
Holding that plaintiff failed to show injury in fact where he "failed to formulate even a basic business plan"
McDowell v. Calderon
197 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 1,257 times
Finding district court does not commit clear error warranting reconsideration when question before it is "debatable"
Casas-Castrillon v. Homeland
535 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 304 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Government's authority to detain a noncitizen under Subsection C ends "upon the dismissal of the alien's appeal by the BIA"
Diouf v. Mukasey
542 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 69 times
Holding that "the plain text of" section 1231(B)"entail judicial review of a removal order "
Rule 59 - New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 Cited 43,342 times 65 Legal Analyses
Allowing a party to move to alter or amend a judgment "no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment"
Rule 23 - Class Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 34,849 times 1232 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed
8 U.S.C. § 1231 Cited 7,784 times 13 Legal Analyses
Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

Amadou Lamine Diouf v. Michael B. Mukasey et al

11 Cited authorities

Holding that the Government's detention authority under Section 1231 is authorized for "a period reasonably necessary to secure removal"

Holding that individual notice to class members identifiable through reasonable efforts is mandatory in (b) actions

Holding that a motion for reconsideration "may not be used to raise arguments or present evidence for first time when they could reasonably have been raised earlier in the litigation"

Holding that "vague claims" cannot generate a factual dispute "adequate to defeat summary judgment"

Holding that plaintiff failed to show injury in fact where he "failed to formulate even a basic business plan"

Finding district court does not commit clear error warranting reconsideration when question before it is "debatable"

Holding that the Government's authority to detain a noncitizen under Subsection C ends "upon the dismissal of the alien's appeal by the BIA"

Holding that "the plain text of" section 1231(B)"entail judicial review of a removal order "

Allowing a party to move to alter or amend a judgment "no later than 28 days after the entry of the judgment"

Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver