50 Cited authorities

  1. Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Meyer

    510 U.S. 471 (1994)   Cited 7,000 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a Bivens claim does not lie against federal agencies because, if damages claims were permitted against federal agencies, "there would be no reason for aggrieved parties to bring damages actions against individual officers" and thus "the deterrent effects of the Bivens remedy would be lost"
  2. Makarova v. U.S.

    201 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 3,945 times
    Holding that legal issues presented by Rule 12(b) motion are reviewed de novo
  3. International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. AT&T

    62 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 1,347 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if a complaint "relies heavily upon [a contract's] terms and effect" the contract may be considered at the 12(b) stage even if the contract is not incorporated in or attached to the complaint
  4. Shipping Financial Services Corp. v. Drakos

    140 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 799 times
    Holding that in considering a 12(b) motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction, a court must assume as true factual allegations in the complaint
  5. Celestine v. Mount Vernon Health Center

    403 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 431 times
    Holding that 42 U.S.C. § 233(c) provides an independent basis for removal under such circumstances
  6. Desiderio v. Nat'l Ass'n of Securities Dealers

    191 F.3d 198 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 365 times
    Holding arbitration clause in form contract on which employment was conditioned not unconscionable contract of adhesion because it bound both parties
  7. San Juan County v. U.S.

    503 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2007)   Cited 236 times
    Holding "that parties seeking to intervene under Rule 24 or (b) need not establish Article III standing ‘so long as another party with constitutional standing on the same side as the intervenor remains in the case’ "
  8. Johnson v. The Smithsonian Inst.

    189 F.3d 180 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 284 times
    Holding that before filing an action in federal court, a plaintiff must comply with the FTCA's procedural requirements
  9. Mack v. U.S.

    814 F.2d 120 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 312 times
    Holding that "a party's affidavit which contradicts his own prior deposition testimony should be disregarded on a motion for summary judgment"
  10. Black v. U.S.

    492 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 173 times
    Holding that § 2410 did not waive sovereign immunity when the government exercised a right of setoff against a taxpayer's money judgement which was in the hands of the IRS
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,620 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 97,351 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  13. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 61,716 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
  14. Section 1346 - United States as defendant

    28 U.S.C. § 1346   Cited 24,031 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Determining liability to the claimant "in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred"
  15. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 10,685 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities
  16. Section 2675 - Disposition by federal agency as prerequisite; evidence

    28 U.S.C. § 2675   Cited 7,073 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth FTCA's administrative exhaustion requirement
  17. Section 702 - Right of review

    5 U.S.C. § 702   Cited 7,049 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review of "agency action"
  18. Section 2401 - Time for commencing action against United States

    28 U.S.C. § 2401   Cited 6,188 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Establishing that an FTCA claim must be brought in writing to the relevant agency within two years after accrual of the claim
  19. Section 1491 - Claims against United States generally; actions involving Tennessee Valley Authority

    28 U.S.C. § 1491   Cited 4,638 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the standard in 5 U.S.C. § 706
  20. Section 1701 - Short title

    12 U.S.C. § 1701   Cited 489 times

    This chapter may be cited as the "National Housing Act." 12 U.S.C. § 1701 June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1246. EDITORIAL NOTES REFERENCES IN TEXTThis chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1246, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1701 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES SHORT TITLE OF 2019 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 116-33 §1, July 25, 2019, 133