§Why CasetextPricing

Almaraz et al v. Vision Drywall & Paint, LLC et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment

12 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 240,643 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,134 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. Cal. Arch. Bldg. Prod. v. Franciscan Ceramics

    818 F.2d 1466 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 1,912 times
    Holding that futility is a valid reason for denying leave to amend

  4. Cooper v. Williamson County Board of Education

    484 U.S. 1006 (1988)   Cited 389 times
    Applying Florida law

  5. Penny v. United Parcel Service

    128 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 478 times
    Holding that "an employee whose only obligation to arbitrate is contained in a collective bargaining agreement retains the right to obtain a judicial determination of his rights under a statute such as the ADA"

  6. Bonnette v. Calif. Health and Welfare Agency

    704 F.2d 1465 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 538 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state and county agencies were employers of in-home chore workers who alleged violations of minimum wage provisions

  7. Patel v. Wargo

    803 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1986)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that "[t]he finding of an enterprise is relevant only to the issue of coverage"

  8. Gilbreath v. Cutter Biological, Inc.

    931 F.2d 1320 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that inmates working at a private plasma center inside prison were not covered by the Act

  9. Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    393 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D.N.J. 2005)   Cited 85 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employment is a question of law under Fair Labor Standards Act, regulations under which define "joint employment" in a manner identical to those under the FMLA

  10. Action Elec. Inc. v. Local 292, Elec. Workers

    818 F.2d 15 (8th Cir. 1987)   Cited 1 times

    No. 87-5107. Decided May 4, 1987. Mary Jane Gooch, Tate and Alden Law Firm, Lincoln, Neb., Steven C. Miller, Minneapolis, Minn., for Action Electric, Inc. David R. Hols, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, Minneapolis, Minn., for National Electrical Contractors Assn. Stephen D. Gordon, Gordon, Miller O'Brien, Minneapolis, Minn., for Local 292, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Before ROSS, Circuit Judge, HENLEY

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,322 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 207 - Maximum hours

    29 U.S.C. § 207   Cited 10,748 times   231 Legal Analyses
    Establishing overtime rules