7 Cited authorities

Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Tr. v. XTO Energy, Inc.
725 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2013) Cited 130 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding the district court abused its discretion by relaxing and shifting plaintiff's burden of proving actual conformity with the requirements of Rule 23
Hammond v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.
216 F.R.D. 666 (D. Kan. 2003) Cited 158 times
Finding that an interrogatory with no temporal limitation was overly broad and limiting the time period
Aikens v. Deluxe Financial Services, Inc.
217 F.R.D. 533 (D. Kan. 2003) Cited 154 times
Holding that a party seeking a stay based on undue burden or expense must explain the burden in detail
In re Urethane Antitrust Litig.
237 F.R.D. 454 (D. Kan. 2006) Cited 22 times
In Urethane, the district court held that the downstream data requested by the defendants bore directly on the class-certification questions of whether common questions of law or fact were predominant and whether the class representatives' claims were typical of the class.
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,611 times 650 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 45,760 times 319 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
Rule 23 - Class Actions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 34,858 times 1232 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

Alexander et al v. BF Labs Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Tr. v. XTO Energy, Inc.

Holding the district court abused its discretion by relaxing and shifting plaintiff's burden of proving actual conformity with the requirements of Rule 23

Hammond v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.

Finding that an interrogatory with no temporal limitation was overly broad and limiting the time period

Aikens v. Deluxe Financial Services, Inc.

Holding that a party seeking a stay based on undue burden or expense must explain the burden in detail

In re Urethane Antitrust Litig.

In Urethane, the district court held that the downstream data requested by the defendants bore directly on the class-certification questions of whether common questions of law or fact were predominant and whether the class representatives' claims were typical of the class.

Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

Rule 23 - Class Actions

Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"