§Why CasetextPricing

ALEC L. et al v. JACKSON et al

MOTION to Intervene

32 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,995 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  2. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,809 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  3. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

    549 U.S. 497 (2007)   Cited 1,163 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denials of petitions for rulemaking are judicially reviewable

  4. Trbovich v. Mine Workers

    404 U.S. 528 (1972)   Cited 897 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union member's interest was not adequately represented by the Secretary of Labor because the Secretary had a "duty to serve two distinct interests, which are related, but not identical:" that of the individual union member and that of the general public

  5. Southwest Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Berg

    268 F.3d 810 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 417 times
    Holding that the court is to take facts alleged in the pleadings, motion, and supporting declarations as true for purposes of the motion to intervene

  6. Wilderness Soc. v. U.S. Forest Service

    630 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 285 times
    Holding that injury in an environmental litigation is met "by showing that group members have direct contact with the environmental subject matter threatened by the adverse decision" (quoting Idaho Farm Bureau Fed'n v. Babbitt , 58 F.3d 1392, 1398 (9th Cir. 1995) )

  7. Northwest Forest Resource v. Glickman

    82 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 397 times
    Holding that “the doctrine of last antecedent ... must yield to the most logical meaning of a statute that emerges from its plain language and legislative history”

  8. Donnelly v. Glickman

    159 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that an applicant may lack an interest in the liability phase of an action, but may still be entitled to intervene in the remedies phase

  9. Keith v. Volpe

    858 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 488 times
    Holding that tenants had standing where defendant city's housing plans caused injury by making affordable housing unavailable to tenants

  10. United States v. City of Los Angeles

    288 F.3d 391 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 258 times
    Holding that "mere[] differences in [litigation] strategy" are insufficient grounds to "justify intervention as a matter of right"

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 347,669 times   925 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,200 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

  13. Section 500 - Administrative practice; general provisions

    5 U.S.C. § 500   Cited 599 times   12 Legal Analyses

    (a) For the purpose of this section- (1) "agency" has the meaning given it by section 551 of this title; and (2) "State" means a State, a territory or possession of the United States including a Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia. (b) An individual who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a State may represent a person before an agency on filing with the agency a written declaration that he is currently qualified as provided by this subsection and is authorized to