§Why CasetextPricing

ALBKRI et al v. BUSH et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re Stay Proceedings Pending Related Appeals

8 Cited authorities

  1. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,346 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion

  2. Al-Fayed v. C.I.A

    254 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 113 times
    Holding that judicial review of agency's denial of expedited processing request is appropriate where plaintiff did not appeal the decision to the agency

  3. In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

    355 F. Supp. 2d 443 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that other Boumediene petitioners were captured in Gambia, Zambia, Bosnia and Thailand

  4. Khalid v. Bush

    355 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 43 times
    Holding that Army Regulations regarding the detainment of prisoners did not create a private right of action

  5. Al-Anazi v. Bush

    370 F. Supp. 2d 188 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 25 times
    Asserting that the petitioners failed to reconcile how the explicit language of § 2242(d) of the FARR Act provides for binding rights outside the context of a final order of removal

  6. O.K. v. Bush

    377 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 6 times
    In O.K. v. Bush, 377 F.Supp.2d 102 (D.D.C. July 12, 2005), Judge John Bates recently decided a similar motion for preliminary injunction.

  7. Almurbati v. Bush

    366 F. Supp. 2d 72 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 6 times
    Denying motion for thirty days' notice but requiring respondents to submit a declaration advising the Court of any transfers and "certifying that any such transfers . . . were not made for the purpose of merely continuing the petitioners' detention on behalf of the United States or for the purpose of extinguishing this Court's jurisdiction over the petitioners' actions for habeas relief"

  8. In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

    Civil Action No. 02-CV-0299 (CKK), No. 04-CV-1135 (ESH), 04-CV-1136 (JDB), 04-CV-1227 (RBW), 04-CV-1144 (RWR), 04-CV-1164 (RBW), 04-CV-1194 (HHK) (D.D.C. Feb. 8, 2005)

    Civil Action No. 02-CV-0299 (CKK), No. 04-CV-1135 (ESH), 04-CV-1136 (JDB), 04-CV-1227 (RBW), 04-CV-1144 (RWR), 04-CV-1164 (RBW), 04-CV-1194 (HHK). February 8, 2005 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING STAY PENDING APPEAL JOYCE GREEN, Senior District Judge Upon consideration of the Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Stay Pending Appeal filed by the petitioners in the above-captioned cases, in light of the substantial resources that would be expended and the significant