11 Cited authorities

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents

    403 U.S. 388 (1971)   Cited 25,896 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is an implied cause of action for money damages against federal officials for violations of the Fourth Amendment
  2. Rasul v. Bush

    215 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 69 times
    In Rasul, the Supreme Court held that alien detainees designated as enemy combatants could invoke the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, to challenge their detention at Guantanamo.
  3. Crew v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

    658 F. Supp. 2d 217 (D.D.C. 2009)   Cited 45 times
    Finding information that recounted “the ingredients of the decision-making process” properly withheld even though the interview in which the information was disclosed took place after decisions were made
  4. De Sousa v. Dep't of State

    840 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D.D.C. 2012)   Cited 26 times
    Concluding that a court "has the discretion to order disclosure of classified information to the Court in a civil case where the information is material to the resolution of disputed legal issues and where alternatives to reliance upon classified information are inadequate to satisfy the interests of justice"
  5. Owen-Williams v. BB & T Investment Services, Inc.

    797 F. Supp. 2d 118 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 21 times
    Stating that the decision to conduct an oral argument "shall be within the discretion of the Court"
  6. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

    344 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 14 times

    Civil Action No. 04-1519 JR. November 8, 2004. Joseph M. Mcmillan, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, Neal Katyal, Kelly A. Cameron, Perkins Coie, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Brian C. Kipnis, U.S. Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, Preeya M. Noronha, U.S. Department of Justice, Terry Marcus Henry, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERTSON, District Judge. Salim Ahmed Hamdan petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the lawfulness of the Secretary of Defense's plan to try

  7. Crummey v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

    857 F. Supp. 2d 117 (D.D.C. 2012)   Cited 4 times

    Civil Action No. 10–01560 (CKK). 2012-04-30 Brent Edward CRUMMEY, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Brent Edward Crummey, Houston, TX, pro se. Gabriel R. Martinez, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for Defendant. COLLEEN KOLLAR–KOTELLY Brent Edward Crummey, Houston, TX, pro se. Gabriel R. Martinez, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR–KOTELLY, District Judge.

  8. Crockett v. Reagan

    558 F. Supp. 893 (D.D.C. 1982)   Cited 24 times
    Concluding that fact-finding necessary to determine violation of War Powers Resolution was properly function of Congress not judiciary
  9. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Weinberger

    562 F. Supp. 265 (D.D.C. 1983)   Cited 9 times

    Civ. A. No. 83-0053. April 12, 1983. Nicholas Y. Yost, Katherine P. Ransel, Kenneth N. Goldenberg, Center for Law in the Public Interest, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Robert D. Daniel, James M. Spears, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Grant Reynolds, Byron D. Baur, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, D.C., for defendants. Daniel J. Popeo, Paul D. Kamenar, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae. MEMORANDUM OPINION BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge: The

  10. United States v. Baber

    447 F.2d 1267 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times
    In United States v. Baber, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 98, 447 F.2d 1267, 1269, cert. denied 404 U.S. 957, 92 S.Ct. 324, 30 L.Ed.2d 274 (1971), the Court states: "We had always assumed that robbery demostrates some traces of dishonesty, involving as it does an intent to steal, thus permitting its use for impeachment."
  11. Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 7   Cited 7,552 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure