550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that fax that "devotes about 75% of the space to mundane advice and the remainder to [Defendant's] name, address, logo, and specialties" was an advertisement
Finding that where a proposed action is a “minimizing measure,” the agency does not need to supplement the EIS because “a minimizing measure's effects on the environment will usually fall within the scope of the original NEPA analysis”
Holding a ban on "peddling" within 1,000 feet of a sports arena unconstitutional because the defendant "provided no objective evidence that traffic flow on the sidewalk or street is disrupted when [the plaintiff] sells his book"
Holding that unsolicited commercial fax prohibition in Telephone Consumer Protection Act was a reasonable fit with substantial governmental interest of reducing costs and intrusion, because commercial faxes are more intrusive than non-commercial faxes
Holding a private action that attacks the validity of an agency order nonetheless implicates the statutory review procedure because "[t]o hold otherwise merely because the issue has arisen in private litigation would permit an end-run around the administrative review mandated by the Hobbs Act"
526 F. Supp. 2d 851 (N.D. Ill. 2007) Cited 41 times
Holding that fax offering $200 honorarium for participating in "research discussion" as part of "research study" is not an advertisement because it "does not promote a ‘commercially available service,’ but a research study"
18 U.S.C. § 1951 Cited 11,921 times 51 Legal Analyses
Defining extortion in ACCA as “the obtaining of something of value from another, with his consent, induced by the wrongful use or threatened use of force against the person or property of another ”