82 Cited authorities

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.
528 U.S. 167 (2000) Cited 7,153 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (1968) Cited 38,178 times 73 Legal Analyses
Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Meyer
510 U.S. 471 (1994) Cited 7,007 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a Bivens claim does not lie against federal agencies because, if damages claims were permitted against federal agencies, "there would be no reason for aggrieved parties to bring damages actions against individual officers" and thus "the deterrent effects of the Bivens remedy would be lost"
Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents
403 U.S. 388 (1971) Cited 25,852 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that there is an implied cause of action for money damages against federal officials for violations of the Fourth Amendment
Rizzo v. Goode
423 U.S. 362 (1976) Cited 13,297 times
Holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to obtain injunctive relief against senior police officials to impose tighter police discipline to prevent harm to civilians
Los Angeles v. Lyons
461 U.S. 95 (1983) Cited 7,506 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
412 U.S. 218 (1973) Cited 11,972 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
Payton v. New York
445 U.S. 573 (1980) Cited 7,629 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"
United States v. Mendenhall
446 U.S. 544 (1980) Cited 6,280 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that knowledge of a right to refuse is "highly relevant to the determination that there had been consent"
Maryland v. Buie
494 U.S. 325 (1990) Cited 2,355 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that, incident to arrest, an officer may conduct a limited protective sweep of those areas of a house in which he reasonably suspects a dangerous person may be hiding
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 345,981 times 922 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1357 - Powers of immigration officers and employees
8 U.S.C. § 1357 Cited 658 times 8 Legal Analyses
Granting immigration enforcement authority to state or local government officials in a formal agreement with a state or local government.
Section 287.8 - Standards for enforcement activities
8 C.F.R. § 287.8 Cited 112 times 1 Legal Analyses
Limiting use of deadly force

Aguilar et al v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States of America Department of Homeland Security

82 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

Holding a Bivens claim does not lie against federal agencies because, if damages claims were permitted against federal agencies, "there would be no reason for aggrieved parties to bring damages actions against individual officers" and thus "the deterrent effects of the Bivens remedy would be lost"

Holding that there is an implied cause of action for money damages against federal officials for violations of the Fourth Amendment

Holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to obtain injunctive relief against senior police officials to impose tighter police discipline to prevent harm to civilians

Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold

Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search

Holding that a New York statute "authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest" was "not consistent with the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that knowledge of a right to refuse is "highly relevant to the determination that there had been consent"

Holding that, incident to arrest, an officer may conduct a limited protective sweep of those areas of a house in which he reasonably suspects a dangerous person may be hiding

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Granting immigration enforcement authority to state or local government officials in a formal agreement with a state or local government.

Limiting use of deadly force