§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Tayinha Banos, Respondent,v.John Rhea, et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

Brief

68 Cited authorities

  1. Goldberg v. Kelly

    397 U.S. 254 (1970)   Cited 4,946 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process rights attach to the deprivation of Government benefits

  2. Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.

    91 N.Y.2d 362 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 724 times
    Finding that the statute of frauds does not apply when compensation could be earned and fixed within a year.

  3. People v. Kennedy

    68 N.Y.2d 569 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 340 times
    Declining to decide whether expert testimony ever would suffice to lay a foundation for the business records exception, and holding that documents should not have been admitted where expert's testimony failed to establish that it was the regular course of the subject business to make the records in question

  4. Benn v. Benn

    82 A.D.3d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 163 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Dismissing so much of the cause of action for conversion predicated upon the conversion of real property

  5. Sutton v. East River Savings Bank

    55 N.Y.2d 550 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 337 times
    Explaining that when interpreting a contract, "the aim is a practical interpretation of the expression of the parties to the end that there be a realization of their reasonable expectations"

  6. Nassau Insurance Company v. Murray

    46 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 327 times
    Applying New York law

  7. Anderson v. Yungkau

    329 U.S. 482 (1947)   Cited 236 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that dismissal in this circumstance is "mandatory"

  8. Escalera v. New York City Housing Authority

    425 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 355 times
    Holding that due process requires detailed notice of the reasons for terminations of tenancies in the public housing context

  9. Swift v. New York Medical College

    25 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 123 times

    2005-02972. January 24, 2006. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered February 16, 2005, as granted those branches of the defendant's motion which were to dismiss the fourth and eighth causes of action and denied those branches of his cross motion which were for leave to amend those causes of action. Harold, Salant, Strassfield Spielberg, White Plains

  10. People v. Ortega

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8608 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 101 times
    In Ortega, the Court of Appeals confirmed a recent expansion of the exception to include even statements about the identity of the perpetrator, where such statements are germane to mental health treatment, safety planning, and other forms of medical and mental health services.

  11. Section 1437f - Low-income housing assistance

    42 U.S.C. § 1437f   Cited 1,299 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Outlining voucher program

  12. Section 202.48 - Submission of orders, judgments and decrees for signature

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 202.48   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Proposed orders or judgments, with proof of service on all parties where the order is directed to be settled or submitted on notice, must be submitted for signature, unless otherwise directed by the court, within 60 days after the signing and filing of the decision directing that the order be settled or submitted. (b) Failure to submit the order or judgment timely shall be deemed an abandonment of the motion or action, unless for good cause shown. (c) (1) When settlement of an order or judgment

  13. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 11 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply