Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,751 times 138 Legal AnalysesHolding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n
432 U.S. 333 (1977) Cited 4,427 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading
Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports
631 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 1,178 timesHolding plaintiff lacks standing to challenge barriers he has not encountered
Automobile Workers v. Brock
477 U.S. 274 (1986) Cited 400 timesHolding that participation of individuals was not required where the district court would not determine damages because "the unique facts of each UAW member's claim will have to be considered by the proper state authorities [post-judgment] before any member will be able to receive the benefits allegedly due him"
Fleck and Associates v. Phoenix
471 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 219 timesHolding corporation does not possess right recognized in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, to make autonomous choices in intimate relations free of government interference: “Corporations are not self-defining autonomous creatures worthy of respect and dignity in the relevant sense.”