§Why CasetextPricing

Adidas America, Inc et al v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.

Memorandum in Opposition Plaintiffs' Memorandum

78 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,094 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

  2. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell

    538 U.S. 408 (2003)   Cited 2,675 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of $145 million in punitive damages on a $1 million compensatory verdict violated due process

  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore

    517 U.S. 559 (1996)   Cited 2,853 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a $2 million punitive damages award was "grossly excessive" and therefore exceeded the constitutional limit

  4. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 18,844 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip

    499 U.S. 1 (1991)   Cited 1,164 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under federal common law, juries determined issues relating to punitive damages

  6. Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group

    532 U.S. 424 (2001)   Cited 800 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that constitutionality of jury's punitive damage award is subject to de novo review

  7. Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan

    506 U.S. 447 (1993)   Cited 780 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proof of relevant market is essential under § 2

  8. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.

    509 U.S. 443 (1993)   Cited 706 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should consider “the potential harm that [the defendant's] actions could have caused”

  9. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc.

    56 F.3d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1995)   Cited 653 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to be an exclusive licensee a party may rely on either an express or implied promise of exclusivity

  10. Tennant v. Peoria P.U. Ry. Co.

    321 U.S. 29 (1944)   Cited 805 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Tennant v. Peoria P. U. R. Co., 321 U.S. 29, one of the leading cases, the Court granted certiorari "because of important problems as to petitioner's right to a jury determination of the issue of causation."

  11. Rule 50 - Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 50   Cited 13,605 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Allowing "renewed motion"

  12. Section 1117 - Recovery for violation of rights

    15 U.S.C. § 1117   Cited 4,886 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts significant discretion to award damages for a violation of § 1125

  13. Section 646.638 - Civil action by private party; damages; attorney fees; effect of prior injunction; time for commencing action; counterclaim; class actions

    ORS § 646.638   Cited 226 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring Plaintiff to establish that Defendant's unlawful act was reckless or knowing