57 Cited authorities

  1. Burt v. Titlow

    571 U.S. 12 (2013)   Cited 3,757 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's decision declining to set aside state court finding that a lawyer was not ineffective did not exonerate the lawyer from the fact that he “may well have violated the rules of professional conduct”
  2. Atl. Marine Constr. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Tex.

    571 U.S. 49 (2013)   Cited 3,672 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the correct procedural mechanism for enforcement of an FSC specifying a foreign forum is through a motion to dismiss for FNC
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno

    454 U.S. 235 (1981)   Cited 4,738 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that potential change in law cannot, by itself, fend off dismissal under forum non conveniens absent showing that new law is "clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory"
  4. Shady Grove Orthopedic v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    559 U.S. 393 (2010)   Cited 1,155 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.

    465 U.S. 770 (1984)   Cited 3,025 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because the defendant was "carrying on a part of its general business" in the state, it was fair to subject the defendant to jurisdiction for a claim arising out of that activity
  6. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.

    456 U.S. 461 (1982)   Cited 2,470 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "full and fair opportunity to litigate" is satisfied by minimum procedural requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment
  7. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles

    568 U.S. 588 (2013)   Cited 693 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff may not evade CAFA jurisdiction by stipulating that the class would seek damages below CAFA's jurisdictional threshold
  8. Van Dusen v. Barrack

    376 U.S. 612 (1964)   Cited 4,627 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "change of venue under § 1404 generally should be, with respect to state law, but a change of courtrooms"
  9. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts

    472 U.S. 797 (1985)   Cited 1,788 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Due Process Clause of course requires that the named plaintiff at all times adequately represent the interests of the absent class members”
  10. Howlett v. Rose

    496 U.S. 356 (1990)   Cited 1,373 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the State and arms of the State . . . are not subject to suit under § 1983"
  11. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 108,040 times   195 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"
  12. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 35,766 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  13. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,923 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  14. Section 1927 - Counsel's liability for excessive costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1927   Cited 8,831 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts the power to charge "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred" due to "unreasonabl[e] and vexatious" conduct
  15. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Ark. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 161 times

    (a)Prerequisites to Class Action. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties and their counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. (b)Class