§Why CasetextPricing

Acer Inc. et al v. Lite-On it Corporation et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment NEC Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment Based Upon Insufficiency of the Evidence and Withdrawal; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof

3 Cited authorities

  1. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 112,965 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

  2. Morton's Mkt., v. Gustafson's Dairy, Inc.

    198 F.3d 823 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 107 times
    Holding it is not enough "to point to facts which might have caused a plaintiff to inquire, or could have led to evidence supporting [the plaintiff's] claim . . . A defendant who does this has succeeded in demonstrating only that there is a jury question regarding the tolling of the statute of limitations by fraudulent concealment"

  3. U.S. v. Lothian

    976 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that "a defendant cannot be held liable for substantive offenses committed before joining or after withdrawing from a conspiracy"