§Why CasetextPricing

Abbott Laboratories et al v. Adelphia Supply USA et al

MEMORANDUM in Support of Plaintiffs' Request for Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction With Temporary Restraining Order

43 Cited authorities

  1. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.

    547 U.S. 388 (2006)   Cited 3,830 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Holding that traditional four-factor test applies to injunctions against patent infringement

  2. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 795 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  3. Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp.

    287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 1,219 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors, including actual confusion, to be considered in assessing whether the Lanham Act’s "likelihood of confusion" test for infringement is met

  4. The Sports Authority v. Prime Hospitality

    89 F.3d 955 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 346 times
    Holding "The Sports Authority" and "sports authority" similar

  5. Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.

    799 F.2d 867 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 458 times
    Holding that the Lanham Act protects against post-sale confusion

  6. Lane Capital Management v. Lane Capital Mgmt

    192 F.3d 337 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 305 times
    Holding that a defendant bears the burden of rebutting the presumption of protectability by a preponderance of the evidence.

  7. United States Polo Ass'n v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.

    800 F. Supp. 2d 515 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 150 times
    Holding that surveys showing 27.8%, 22.5%, and 17.8% net confusion rates were sufficient to prove actual confusion

  8. Societe Des Proouits Nestle v. Casa Helvetia

    982 F.2d 633 (1st Cir. 1992)   Cited 147 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the unauthorized importation of an otherwise "genuine" product rendered it "counterfeit" and thus subject to prohibition under the Lanham Act

  9. Weight Watchers Intern. v. Luigino's, Inc.

    423 F.3d 137 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 97 times
    Determining that Luigino's "use of the term 'Points' on the front" of its packaging "was likely to confuse consumers into believing that Weight Watchers had determined the point values or otherwise endorsed the Luigino's products"

  10. El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc.

    806 F.2d 392 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding shoe manufacturer liable for selling shoes bearing the genuine Candie's trademark after its contract with Candie's had been cancelled

  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,038 times   662 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  12. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,357 times   321 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"

  13. Section 1114 - Remedies; infringement; innocent infringement by printers and publishers

    15 U.S.C. § 1114   Cited 7,948 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."

  14. Section 331 - Prohibited acts

    21 U.S.C. § 331   Cited 1,519 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the sale of adulterated foods

  15. Section 352 - Misbranded drugs and devices

    21 U.S.C. § 352   Cited 740 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Setting labeling requirements for drug products

  16. Section 333 - Penalties

    21 U.S.C. § 333   Cited 439 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Defining civil and criminal penalties for violations of Section 331

  17. Section 360-L - Injury to business reputation; dilution

    N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360-L   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing liability "notwithstanding the absence of competition between the parties or the absence of confusion as to the source of goods or services."

  18. Section 1657 - Priority of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1657   Cited 100 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Specifying claims under 5 U.S.C. § 552 as an example in which good cause for expediting may exist

  19. Section 801.5 - Medical devices; adequate directions for use

    21 C.F.R. § 801.5   Cited 37 times
    Defining "adequate directions for use"