§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Westchester Joint Water Works, Appellant,v.Assessor of City of Rye, Respondent; Rye Neck Union Free School District, Intervenor-Respondent. (And Other Proceedings.)

Brief

13 Cited authorities

  1. Grant Co. v. Srogi

    52 N.Y.2d 496 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 834 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Denying injunction to present appellant on basis that it lacks equitable standing to assert aggravated pattern of tax abuse against its predecessor in title

  2. Yonkers Contracting Co. v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson

    93 N.Y.2d 375 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 130 times
    Holding that a dismissal with prejudice is a final adjudication upon the merits for section 205 purposes

  3. Finger v. Saal

    56 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 53 times

    Nos. 2007-06436, 2008-00131, 2008-00152. November 18, 2008. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for trespass and nuisance, (1) the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered June 26, 2007, which denied, as untimely, their separate cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, (2) the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, also entered June 26, 2007, as denied their cross

  4. People v. Havrish

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2787 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that had defendant not surrendered weapons pursuant to order of protection, "he could have been prosecuted for criminal contempt"

  5. In re Wyeth Holdings Corp.

    84 A.D.3d 1104 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 9 times

    No. 2009-10351. May 17, 2011. In two related tax certiorari proceedings for the tax years 2007 and 2008, Nanuet Union Free School District appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (LaCava, J.), dated September 22, 2009, as denied its motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the petitions were not served upon its Superintendent of Schools and granted that branch of the petitioner's cross motion which was to deem the petitions timely

  6. Andre v. New York

    47 A.D.3d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 9 times

    No. 2006-08509. January 8, 2008. In an action, inter alia, in effect, to enjoin the defendant City of New York from transferring certain transit operations to the defendant Metropolitan Transportation Authority and for a judgment declaring that the defendants entered into certain contracts in violation of statutory competitive bidding requirements, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated July 25

  7. Board of Managers of Copley Court Condominium v. Town of Ossining

    79 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 6 times

    No. 2009-09808. December 21, 2010. In six related tax certiorari proceedings for the tax years 2002 through 2007, Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered September 10, 2009, which denied its motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that the petitions were not served upon its Superintendent of Schools and granted the petitioner's cross motion for leave to serve the petitions upon the Superintendent of Schools

  8. Cornwall Yacht Club, Inc. v. Assessor

    110 A.D.3d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 3 times

    2013-10-30 In the Matter of CORNWALL YACHT CLUB, INC., appellant, v. ASSESSOR, et al., respondents; Cornwall Central School District, nonparty-respondent. Murphy & Lynch, P.C., East Norwich, N.Y. (Paul L. Damato and Heather Wine of counsel), for appellant. Garvin & Ferlazzo, P.C., Albany, N.Y. (Christopher P. Langlois and Robert F. Manfredo of counsel), for nonparty-respondent. Murphy & Lynch, P.C., East Norwich, N.Y. (Paul L. Damato and Heather Wine of counsel), for appellant. Garvin & Ferlazzo

  9. Bd. of Managers of Copley Court Condo. v. Town of Ossining

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4275 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    2012-06-5 In the Matter of BOARD OF MANAGERS OF COPLEY COURT CONDOMINIUM, Appellant, v. TOWN OF OSSINING et al., Respondents, and Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District, Respondent. Bleakley Platt & Schmidt, LLP, White Plains (Hugh D. Fyfe of counsel), for appellant. Kuntz, Spagnuolo, Murphy & Gronbach, P.C., Bedford (Raymond G. Kuntz of counsel), for Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District, respondent. Bleakley Platt & Schmidt, LLP, White Plains (Hugh D. Fyfe of counsel), for appellant

  10. MM 1, LLC v. LaVancher

    72 A.D.3d 1497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 2 times

    No. 254 CA 09-02043. April 30, 2010. Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered March 20, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order, inter alia, dismissed the petition with permission to petitioner to commence a new proceeding pursuant to CPLR 205 within six months after termination of the proceeding. FERRARA, FIORENZA, LARRISON, BARRETT REITZ, P.C., EAST SYRACUSE (JOSEPH G. SHIELDS OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENOR-RESP