§Why CasetextPricing

Excess Line Association of New York (ELANY), Appellant,v.Waldorf & Associates, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 827 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"

  2. Community Bd. 7 v. Schaffer

    84 N.Y.2d 148 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 243 times
    Finding such a stake where the defendant's breach of a covenant affected plaintiff's property interest

  3. City of New York v. City Civil Service Commission

    60 N.Y.2d 436 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 110 times
    Holding that the DCAS Commissioner's predecessor "has both policy-making authority and functional responsibility for civil service matters in New York City"

  4. Medical Malpractice Insurance Ass'n v. Superintendent of Insurance

    72 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 58 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Argued November 16, 1988 Decided December 15, 1988 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Martin Evans, J. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Richard G. Liskov, O. Peter Sherwood and Lawrence S. Kahn of counsel), for appellant. T. Richard Kennedy, Larry P. Schiffer and Michael A. Knoerzer for respondent. TITONE, J. In response to the continuing upward spiral of medical malpractice liability insurance, the Legislature, in 1985 and again in 1986, passed

  5. Bluebird Partners v. First Fidelity Bank

    97 N.Y.2d 456 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 35 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that before § 13-107's passage, "a transfer of bonds did not automatically carry with it existing claims for damages against a trustee; an express agreement was required to transfer those claims" and recognizing that the current rule places New York at odds with most other jurisdictions

  6. Schiavone v. City of New York

    92 N.Y.2d 308 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 27 times

    92 N.Y.2d 308 703 N.E.2d 256, 680 N.Y.S.2d 445 James SCHIAVONE, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. 1998-08883 New York Court of Appeals October 20, 1998. Moskowitz, Passmans&sEdelman, New York City (Jeffrey M. Motelson, of counsel), for appellant. Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Barry P. Schwartz, Leonard Koerner and Janet L. Zaleon, of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT WESLEY, Judge. This case requires us to examine the scope of the revival provision