8 Cited authorities

  1. Burke v. Crosson

    85 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 153 times

    Argued January 5, 1995 Decided February 9, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Rosemary S. Pooler, J. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh, Jerry Boone and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Edward Regan and another, appellants. Michael Colodner, New York City, John Eiseman and John J. Sullivan for Matthew T. Crosson, appellant. Julian Pertz, P.C., Utica (Robert F. Julian of counsel), for respondents. TITONE, J. Plaintiffs, three Onondaga County Court Judges, commenced

  2. Matter of Prudco Realty Corp. v. Palermo

    60 N.Y.2d 656 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 52 times

    Decided September 20, 1983 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PAUL T. D'AMARO, J. William A. Wismann for intervenor-appellant. Floyd G. Grossman for Prudco Realty Corp., respondent. Martin J. Kerins and Sherri Ann Levy for Gerald E. Palermo and others, respondents. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to review a determination of the zoning board of appeals

  3. Nelson v. Garcia

    152 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 18 times

    November 15, 1989 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Edward A. Rath, J. O'Shea, Reynolds, Napier, Quinn Cummings (Kenneth R. Kirby of counsel), for Richard G. Garcia and others, appellants. Smith, Murphy Schoepperle (Robert J. Whetzle of counsel), for respondent. DENMAN, J. In these four consolidated actions seeking to recover for personal injuries sustained in a multiple vehicle accident, the court properly granted the motion of the Town of Holland for summary judgment dismissing all claims

  4. Miller v. Morania Oil of Long Island, O.C.P

    194 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 13 times

    June 28, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. On December 6, 1987, the plaintiffs arrived at their home in Great Neck, Long Island and found that a fire was in progress. Alert Fire, Engine, Hook, Ladder Hose Co. No. 1 was called and came to the scene within minutes. Some time later, the Fire Chief told the plaintiffs that the fire was extinguished

  5. Miller v. Savage

    237 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 9 times

    March 6, 1997. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered April 19, 1996 in Fulton County, which granted a motion made by defendant Sir William Johnson Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Before: White, J. P., Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ. Peters, J. On February 27, 1993, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident when the vehicle which he was operating was struck head-on by a vehicle driven by defendant Christopher

  6. Sawyer v. Town of Lewis

    6 Misc. 3d 1024 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003)   Cited 3 times

    September 5, 2003. McGuire, J. Municipal Corporations — Tort Liability — Firefighters — Volunteer Firefighters.

  7. Sawyer v. Town of Lewis

    11 A.D.3d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    CA 04-00408. October 1, 2004. Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (Joseph D. McGuire, J.), dated September 22, 2003. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Town of Ava for summary judgment and denied the motions of defendants West Leyden Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., Steven W. Sullivan, Linda S. Sullivan and Town of Lewis for summary judgment in a personal injury action. Before: Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ. It is hereby ordered that

  8. Matter of Hamdy v. Hamdy

    203 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 1 times

    April 15, 1994 Appeal from the Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Davis and Boehm, JJ. Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent's argument that findings of fact with respect to maintenance arrears were required. The record on appeal contains no answer to the petition seeking arrears, so the allegation that $975 was due was not put in issue. Respondent failed to preserve for review his contention that he was denied his right